Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/dbase dbase.c

2003-07-16 Thread Sterling Hughes
woops :) -Sterling On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 10:06, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > > Right, and if they change, then old code doesn't work. > > There is NO old code... this was added yesterday. > > Derick -- There is no safe investment. To love at all is

Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/dbase dbase.c

2003-07-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote: > Right, and if they change, then old code doesn't work. There is NO old code... this was added yesterday. Derick -- "Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those that read the future by examining animal en

Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/dbase dbase.c

2003-07-16 Thread Sterling Hughes
Right, and if they change, then old code doesn't work. Function names are just elements within an associative array after all ;-) -Sterling On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 09:54, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > > Why create such names? Where is the advantage? If

Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/dbase dbase.c

2003-07-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote: > Why create such names? Where is the advantage? If you are going to > change it, please just make them aliases, so you can use either. uhm? Those were just names for the keys of the elements in an associative array... Derick -- "Interpreting what

Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/dbase dbase.c

2003-07-16 Thread Sterling Hughes
Why create such names? Where is the advantage? If you are going to change it, please just make them aliases, so you can use either. -Sterling On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 07:08, Zak Greant wrote: > zak Wed Jul 16 07:08:03 2003 EDT > > Modified files: > /php-src/ext/dbase