Hello Adam,
sorry i don't have any additional testcases but take your time and count
the bytes and columns in the testcase yourself. You'll find out that they
are worthless.
regards
marcus
and yes i know how fast Daniel is and therefore looked into the code myself
but couldn't find a mistake i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Log:
> - If you ask me both (expat and libxml) are not really accurate about byte
> po
From: "Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> > +this test works fine with Expat but fails with libxml
> > +which we now use as default
> Can you report this on the libxml2 mailing list? There's been some
> recent traffic on the list w/
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> +/*
> +this test works fine with Expat but fails with libxml
> +which we now use as default
> +
> +further investigation has shown that not only line count
> +is skippet on CDATA sections but that libxml does also
> +show different column numbers an
