On Mon, February 27, 2012 2:31 am, Laruence wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com
wrote:
Hi Laruence,
The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563)
makes it
better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just in a
single
place.
Out of curiosity, why are you changing it to copy the object for the
result of the cast operation? cast_object should init the result
zval, so why go through the step of copying the starting object to it?
Wouldn't it be easier just to do:
if (Z_OBJ_HANDLER_PP(arg, cast_object)) {
Sent from my iPad
在 2012-2-28，0:10，Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com 写道：
Out of curiosity, why are you changing it to copy the object for the
result of the cast operation? cast_object should init the result
zval, so why go through the step of copying the starting object to
plz look at the
I initially looked at the final fix when I discovered the issue.
Follow me out on this. This is the current code as-implemented in
r323563:
265 zval *obj;
266 MAKE_STD_ZVAL(obj);
267 if (Z_OBJ_HANDLER_P(*arg, cast_object)(*arg, obj,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
I initially looked at the final fix when I discovered the issue.
Follow me out on this. This is the current code as-implemented in
r323563:
265 zval *obj;
266
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Xinchen Hui larue...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
I initially looked at the final fix when I discovered the issue.
Follow me out on this. This is the current code as-implemented in
r323563:
