Commit:b47d6b32ba8d6dc1b9d1fc91a83eef29a28363c5
Author:Reeze Xia reeze@gmail.com Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:01:20
+0800
Committer: Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes cataphr...@php.net Tue, 17 Jul
2012 23:08:11 +0200
Parents: d0e58bf6eb54676a711d98d3b72a13e828e2deef
Branches:
Hi!
Commit:b47d6b32ba8d6dc1b9d1fc91a83eef29a28363c5
Author:Reeze Xia reeze@gmail.com Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:01:20
+0800
Committer: Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes cataphr...@php.net Tue, 17
Jul 2012 23:08:11 +0200
Parents: d0e58bf6eb54676a711d98d3b72a13e828e2deef
Em Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:49:55 +0200, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
escreveu:
Commit:b47d6b32ba8d6dc1b9d1fc91a83eef29a28363c5
Author:Reeze Xia reeze@gmail.com Tue, 17 Jul 2012
23:01:20 +0800
Committer: Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes cataphr...@php.net
Tue, 17
Hi!
I think that's overly cautious given the simplicity of the problem and the
fix, but it's your call.
But even as a matter of principle, I don't know why you'd need a new RC in
one case, but not in the other. You'd have a release different from the
Because revert means going back