Hi
2011/9/6 Hannes Magnusson :
> Can you post the diff?
> I don't see any reason why it should fail..
Windows for one does not implement a native ftok() function, and the
general use with ftok() was together with sysvshm(). If we have such
an implementation, it would make sense to enable sysvshm
Can you post the diff?
I don't see any reason why it should fail..
-Hannes
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:29, Pierre Joye wrote:
> no idea but this test is in there and fails when the ext is not
> loadead, so I simply skip if the ext is not available. Feel free to
> move this test if its location is
no idea but this test is in there and fails when the ext is not
loadead, so I simply skip if the ext is not available. Feel free to
move this test if its location is wrong.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 09:49, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> pajoye
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 09:49, Pierre Joye wrote:
> pajoye Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:49:31 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=316230
>
> Log:
> - add skipif
>
> Changed paths:
> U php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.p
pajoye Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:49:31 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=316230
Log:
- add skipif
Changed paths:
U php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt
U php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_4/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.p
