hi,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>> Perhaps someone's private code used it?
>>
>
> Sure, it's possible. In that case, they'll have a long time to complain
> since this is only for trunk and PHP 5.5 is years away.
No, php-next begins next year, one year after we began 5
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:00:21 +0100, Christopher Jones
wrote:
On 02/21/2012 01:55 PM, Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes wrote:
cataphract Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:55:00 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=323416
Log:
- Revert r134029. The
On 02/21/2012 01:55 PM, Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes wrote:
cataphract Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:55:00 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=323416
Log:
- Revert r134029. The streams pooling API was never used in more
than 8 years and th
cataphract Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:55:00 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=323416
Log:
- Revert r134029. The streams pooling API was never used in more
than 8 years and therefore unnecessarily adds complexity.
Changed paths:
U php/
