Guten Tag Herr Scott,
Montag, 25. Juni 2001, 11:21:42, schrieben sie:
JS> Hi again, another conundrum.
JS> What is the best way to deal with the following situation?
JS> You have a group of common properties including a property that indicates a
JS> second group of common properties. For exa
I would create another table called "extras" that include all possible extra
choices. This table has a SpeciesID field to assign it to a species.
A third table called "details" could have OfficerID and ExtrasID and ExtrasValue
fields. That way you could have as many or as few extras as you want
Hi again, another conundrum.
What is the best way to deal with the following situation?
You have a group of common properties including a property that indicates a
second group of common properties. For example,
suppose you have this table:
Officers
Name
Rank
Age
Height
Weight
Sp
