On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 17:36 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> David McGlone wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 11:23 -0500, David McGlone wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 12:27 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> >>> > > David McGlone wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone I got a quick question. I'm wondering
David McGlone wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 11:23 -0500, David McGlone wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 12:27 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> > David McGlone wrote:
> > > Hi everyone I got a quick question. I'm wondering if anyone is using a
> > > DB abstraction layer such as PEAR DB. I've
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 11:23 -0500, David McGlone wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 12:27 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> > David McGlone wrote:
> > > Hi everyone I got a quick question. I'm wondering if anyone is using a
> > > DB abstraction layer such as PEAR DB. I've used PEAR DB in the past and
> > >
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 12:27 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> David McGlone wrote:
> > Hi everyone I got a quick question. I'm wondering if anyone is using a
> > DB abstraction layer such as PEAR DB. I've used PEAR DB in the past and
> > knew it's been on it's way to extinction, but never looked into
>
David McGlone wrote:
Hi everyone I got a quick question. I'm wondering if anyone is using a
DB abstraction layer such as PEAR DB. I've used PEAR DB in the past and
knew it's been on it's way to extinction, but never looked into
alternatives or any other way to replace it. Now this has come back t
