Hi, this is my first post on this list. I've never used PHP, but I'm
interested in exploring it, along with MySQL and Apache server software.
Very briefly, my main focus is on designing webpages. I've been unemployed
for several months and have been using my extra time to learn new computer
I joined this list a few weeks ago because I wanted to learn about php.
Unfortunately, I still haven't found time to study it in any depth. Thus,
my question might be a bit amateurish, but it's fairly urgent, so I'd
appreciate any feedback anyone cares to offer.
I'm working on a new website
At 09:16 PM 6/19/2003 -0500, Joshua Stein wrote:
it won't cause any problems. you'll have the very small overhead of
having to run every static page through php's parser, but if you're going
to have php in these pages in the future it doesn't really matter.
Also, I'm thinking of naming all
At 02:19 PM 6/20/2003 +0200, Thorsten Körner wrote:
This will run, and I think almost without problems. But IMHO it makes no
sense. And I don't know, if all the searchengines out there will be able or
willing to read *.php files (google works fine).
Are you saying that some search engines might
At 05:58 PM 8/3/2003 -0600, David Smith wrote:
This doesn't have much to do with PHP and databases, but here's a thought:
You can leave them all .htm and have apache treat .htm files as .php
files. Just check out httpd.conf for configuration. If your box is
sufficiently zippy, you will see now
At 01:42 AM 8/4/2003 -0400, Dennis Cole wrote:
Also,
You would be best off changing only the one you thing you might need to
use PHP later with, changing Apache to phase all .htm pages can get
really slow is a insect comes about.
I'll probably use server side includes for footers and other
