Hello Stuart,
After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821
Compliant.
Being that this was a code I found several years ago, RFC822 may not
have been in effect.
This being the reason (I believe) that the
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.comwrote:
Hello Stuart,
After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821
Compliant.
Being that this was a code I found several years ago,
@Stuart
Ah, then you are right that they were not compliant. The code is not
that old.
Thank you so much for the links and information too. Much more than I
expected.
I did not know that they were sent OS-Independent, but that makes
perfect sense.
Again, please excuse my lack of
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.comwrote:
@Stuart,
Actually that is what made me look into the PHP_EOL Stuart. Wanting to do
things right.
Did you not read my initial email? I am not suggesting anyone adopt my
code.
The question was directed to what the
I see. Yes, I was referring to the PHP manual.
I will investigate the RFC manuals as well like you had noted.
No offense taken. Thank you for the clarification.
Best,
Karl
On Jul 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers
k...@designdrumm.com
