[PHP-DB] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] slow performance
If you interested in further improving performance, look at bytecode caches such as Zend Platform or APC. It can be especially beneficial if you use frameworks containing a lot of PHP classes. As I already mentioned, I used eAccelerator. Does APC perform better? No idea about eAccelerator, didn't test it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DB] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] slow performance
Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > If you interested in further improving performance, look at bytecode > caches such as Zend Platform or APC. It can be especially beneficial if > you use frameworks containing a lot of PHP classes. As I already mentioned, I used eAccelerator. Does APC perform better? -- ... Gentlemen: Start your debuggers... -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DB] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] slow performance
OK, so FastCGI is much better than ISAPI? Looking quickly at the Not exactly so - the thing here is that non-threadsafe PHP is faster than threadsafe PHP - since no inter-thread locking is necessary. And since ISAPI PHP must be TS and FastCGI PHP can be non-TS - the FastCGI PHP ends up being faster. Note that is you just use thread-safe FastCGI you probably won't get any benefits. IIRC standard PHP builds now include non-TS versions, and so does Zend Core. If you interested in further improving performance, look at bytecode caches such as Zend Platform or APC. It can be especially beneficial if you use frameworks containing a lot of PHP classes. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
