Re: [PHP-DB] blob versus file

2002-07-02 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:45:40 +0200 Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is the increase of the network traffic noticable? The query is pretty small just text. Do u really think this might increase the traffic? Try to heavely charge a DB with images inside it. Do the same without DB, that depends if

Re: [PHP-DB] blob versus file

2002-07-02 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, one point that you should keeped in mind is, if you have a cluster of webservers connecting to the same db-server, then you have to mount the filesystems, where you store the images on all webservers. On the other hand many db's like oracle have many restrictions with lobs. In oracle you

Re: [PHP-DB] blob versus file

2002-07-02 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:57:56 +0200 Michael Bretterklieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, one point that you should keeped in mind is, if you have a cluster of webservers connecting to the same db-server, then you have to mount the filesystems, where you store the images on all webservers.

Re: [PHP-DB] blob versus file

2002-07-01 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:17:53 +0200 andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I am wondering if anybody has experiance in saving images to blob in mysql. I do save images with 1 K and 4 KB to blob fields while I used to save them to file. It seams to me that this is much slower accessing the

Re: [PHP-DB] blob versus file

2002-07-01 Thread Andy
is the increase of the network traffic noticable? The query is pretty small just text. Do u really think this might increase the traffic? I also noticed that the image is not cached anymore. Is this true for all blobs, or do I just access them in a wron way? (I am requesting a php file in the