Re: [PHP-DEV] Open issues for 4.0.6

2001-05-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:01 PM 5/18/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: Okay but I don't think there is much left to do for 4.0.6 and it can hopefully be released within a week or so. Any idea who is tackling that mcrypt() problem? Does this happen to everyone

Re: [PHP-DEV] Open issues for 4.0.6

2001-05-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
Can you grab the latest CVS and check if this is fixed. Derick commited a couple of fixes yesterday. Andi At 05:13 PM 5/18/2001 +0100, Chris Walker wrote: Hello Andi, Friday, May 18, 2001, 5:07:46 PM, you wrote: AG I think there are two main open issues for 4.0.6. AG The crash in mcrypt (if it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Open issues for 4.0.6

2001-05-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
I don't know but I feel it's wrong to do an == check because people might be using this PHP version when 2.4.18 is out. Andi At 06:47 PM 5/19/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: I just committed a fix to the CVS, this solved the problem for me

Re: [PHP-DEV] Open issues for 4.0.6

2001-05-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 07:11 PM 5/19/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: I don't know but I feel it's wrong to do an == check because people might be using this PHP version when 2.4.18 is out. True, but I just tried 2.4.13, and it didn't compile straight out of the box

RE: [PHP-DEV] mailparse extension

2001-05-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
Was that in chinese? :) Andi At 12:28 PM 5/20/2001 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote: Ooops. That says something along the lines of: I have commited my mailparse extension since there was no negative feedback when I asked about doing it a couple of weeks ago. --Wez.

Re: [PHP-DEV] gd/config.m4 - some issues left

2001-05-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
Please don't forget the 4.0.6 branch when you address this. Andi At 01:45 PM 5/20/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: These three lines contain the and operator (-a) which is not followed by an expression: if test $PHP_JPEG_DIR != no -a $PHP_JPEG_DIR; then if test

Re: [PHP-DEV] memory allocation for PG() variables.

2001-05-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
I'm pretty sure it's malloc()'ed. In any case, you'll crash pretty quickly if you use the wrong one :) Andi At 09:41 PM 5/20/2001 -0400, Egan wrote: I see that PG(open_basdir) holds the value of open_basedir. I need to make a local hack to alter that value, adding a path from an Apache

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest CVS on Win32

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
Are you sure you rebuilt the whole tree? It works fine for me. Do you have an extremely short reproducing script? Andi At 06:58 AM 5/21/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: With the latest CVS on Win32 I get the following warnings Warning: Unknown list entry type in request shutdown

[PHP-DEV] db vs. dba

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, Do people still use db or has it become an antique due to dba? Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest CVS on Win32

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
+0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote: Are you sure you rebuilt the whole tree? It works fine for me. Yes, I rebuilt completely. Do you have an extremely short reproducing script? ?php $xmldoc = domxml_new_xmldoc('1.0'); $root = $xmldoc-add_root('root

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 07:05 PM 5/21/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote: Well it sounds like a bug in domxml to me. Damn. The first time I need this extension it turns out that it's broken :-/ Maybe yesterday's patch unveiled this bug because there is no reason I can think of (unless

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 07:56 PM 5/21/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote: a) the SAP extension. I want to nuke it from the CVS repository completely and have Uwe return it when he has time to continue the work. s/Uwe/Hartmut Yep. b) Has DOM XML been reverted to the 4.0.5 version

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:37 PM 5/21/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: Well php-dev, wake up! :) What do we do with this one? I don't think 4.0.6 should linger forever because of it. My vote is to revert the changes made to it. Do you know what to revert to? Apparently

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:42 PM 5/21/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: Do you know what to revert to? Apparently it didn't work in 4.0.5 either. Huh? Revision 1.29 says complete rewrite of domxml module, and 1.28 is where 4.0.5 was branched so that's what you'd revert

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:13 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, Colin Viebrock wrote: Do you know what to revert to? Apparently it didn't work in 4.0.5 either. Huh? Revision 1.29 says complete rewrite of domxml module, and 1.28 is where 4.0.5 was branched so that's what you'd revert back to. I'm sorry but I'll be a wee

[PHP-DEV] Removed php4/ext/saprfc

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, I've removed the SAP model so that we can make a clean and easy 4.0.6 release. We can return it after 4.0.6 although it's probably best only to return it once it's in a relatively OK state. You should all remove the following from your php4/ext/CVS/Entries file or you'll get an annoying

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:43 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: Colin Viebrock wrote: Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): upgrade to cURL 7.7.3 What about a configure msg? It's probably worth it. Andi

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:53 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote: At 03:43 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote: Colin Viebrock wrote: Can you please check 4.0.6RC1? (http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz) Getting make errors with CURL (which I never got before): upgrade

Re: [PHP-DEV] Using $HTTP_SESSION_VARS with register_globals On

2001-05-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 05:02 PM 5/21/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess logically we should make the global variable take precedence and perhaps even export any changes to $HTTP_SESSION_VARS into the global symbol table. Somewhat magical, but what else can

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug or undocumented feature: static?

2001-05-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
It is supposed to behave like this. We took the C++ model. Andi At 12:13 PM 5/22/2001 +0200, Ulf Wendel wrote: Hi, I stepped into something yesterday I would call an undocumented feature or a bug, don't know if I should make a bug report. Here's the snippet: function bar() { static $j = 0;

Fwd: Re: [PHP-DEV] Using $HTTP_SESSION_VARS with register_globals On

2001-05-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
If any of the documentation team has time to take care of this it would be great. Thanks, Andi Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:54:26 -0500 From: Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV

Re: [PHP-DEV] output/threads aborting

2001-05-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:48 PM 5/22/2001 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: Hello everyone, With the current CVS debug_ts build I'm getting an abort in the TSRM library. I've tracked this down to php_module_startup() in main.c. The call to php_output_startup() on line 783 accesses thread specific data, however the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Fix for bugs 8808, 8821, 9130, and possibly 10209

2001-05-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
I patched and commited the source. You just wanted to add CS_PUBLIC, right? You should specify it next time so that I don't have to do a diff in my head :) Also, what does CS_PUBLIC mean? Does it translate to __declspec(dllexport)? If so maybe we should be removing the static? Andi At 02:34

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC2

2001-05-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
Guys, I'd like to roll 4.0.6RC2 this evening (my evening which is in like 12 hours) as I mentioned a couple of days ago. I think we can also send it with a good explanation of what it is and what it isn't to php-general@ and get some more testing done and hopefully release 4.0.6 ASAP. Andi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest CVS on Win32

2001-05-23 Thread Andi Gutmans
I just commited a fix. Please try the latest CVS. Andi At 06:37 AM 5/23/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Latest CVS on Win32 builds, but it crashes on startup (CGI). -- sebastian bergmann[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] output/threads aborting

2001-05-23 Thread Andi Gutmans
Shane, Please try the latest CVS. I commited a patch. Andi At 03:48 PM 5/22/2001 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: Hello everyone, With the current CVS debug_ts build I'm getting an abort in the TSRM library. I've tracked this down to php_module_startup() in main.c. The call to

[PHP-DEV] Rollback of DOM/XML to 4.0.5 version

2001-05-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hi, I rolled back DOM/XML and will hopefully roll RC2 today. I think my rollback of config.m4 might not have been completely correct because some reorganizations of the config.m4 files were made I think before we branched 4.0.6. Can someone please check my commit and see if I should fully or

[PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
At link I'm getting gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic' My gcc version: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) It's not an error but is this option really necessary? Andi -- PHP Development

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:07 PM 5/24/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2001, Boian Bonev wrote: At link I'm getting gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic' My gcc version: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux

Re: [PHP-DEV] Rollback of DOM/XML to 4.0.5 version

2001-05-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:08 PM 5/24/2001 +, Christian Stocker wrote: On 24 May 2001 05:39:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote: Hi, I rolled back DOM/XML and will hopefully roll RC2 today. I think my mmmh. checking for DOM support... yes ./configure: line 15188: syntax error near unexpected

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6RC4 out.

2001-06-19 Thread Andi Gutmans
Part of the getting back to normal process is getting 4.0.6 out of the door :) Please test it http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC4.tar.gz I *really* would like to get it out. By the way, I commited a very important patch which should lower memory use considerably (up to about 2/3). Please let

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6 - ?

2001-06-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hopefully ASAP. We should release RC4 unless people find *serious* problems. Andi At 02:53 PM 6/19/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: When are we releasing 4.0.6? I'm asking more as an end user because it has a few bug fixes that affect our products. -Andrei * Power corrupts. Atomic power

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #11557 Updated: session,functions

2001-06-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
Do you have a d:/tmp directory? Andi At 09:37 AM 2/9/2001 +0530, Vikram-burlee wrote: Hi, this is the snippete ?php session_start(); ? and error is Warning: open(/tmp\sess_e381bf8b6b5aea5756925a218535fdd3, O_RDWR) failed: m (2) in D:\php\vik\test.php on line 2 Iam not able to use any

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6

2001-06-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, I suggest in order to get 4.0.6 out of the door I will package it today (the release), post it to php-devphp-qa and we can announce it on Friday. Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.6 Packaged!

2001-06-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6.tar.gz Tomorrow I'll commit it to the phpweb CVS and we'll announce it on Friday. Please in the meanwhile make sure that no show stoppers have crept in. Show stoppers == something is completely broken in the core or a terrible security hole which needs to be

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6 Packaged!

2001-06-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 05:54 AM 6/21/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6.tar.gz Tomorrow I'll commit it to the phpweb CVS and we'll announce it on Friday. Please in the meanwhile make sure that no show stoppers have crept in. Show stoppers == something is completely broken

Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.6

2001-06-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 09:03 AM 6/21/2001 +0100, Phil Driscoll wrote: On Wednesday 20 June 2001 17:22, Andi Gutmans wrote: I suggest in order to get 4.0.6 out of the door I will package it today (the release), post it to php-devphp-qa and we can announce it on Friday. Sounds good. For the last release

[PHP-DEV] Re: can we cange the important defines to enums in the zend-headers, please?

2001-06-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
I want to mess with it a bit and think about it. Will get back to you ASAP. Andi At 08:50 AM 6/22/2001 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: hi, it would make debugging for guys like me easier, as gdb will then be able to show IS_OBJECT instead of 5 when inspecting zvals. (gdb

[PHP-DEV] Re: can we cange the important defines to enums in the zend-headers, please?

2001-06-22 Thread Andi Gutmans
Thies, I am not quite sure how many places need to be changed for this. On a whole, moving to enum's is something I've wanted to do for a long time but never had the time to do. If you're up to it maybe you can create a patch which we can look at. I suggest only trying to make the

Re: [PHP-DEV] is_scalar

2001-06-23 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 05:21 PM 6/23/2001 -0600, Zak Greant wrote: Hello All, I was just reviewing the is_scalar() function and noted that the function does not consider resources to be scalar values. Shouldn't this be changed? I must have missed this when I initially wrote the function... I don't think resources

Re: [PHP-DEV] module versioning

2001-06-23 Thread Andi Gutmans
I think we should also consider saving the version in the extension structure and having generic function such as extension_version(xml). This would save us from having to bloat PHP by adding a foo_version() function to all extensions. Andi At 11:46 AM 6/24/2001 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] module versioning

2001-06-23 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 02:38 PM 6/24/2001 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: I think we should also consider saving the version in the extension structure and having generic function such as extension_version(xml). This would save us from having to bloat PHP by adding

Re: [PHP-DEV] module versioning

2001-06-23 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 06:26 AM 6/24/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: I think we should also consider saving the version in the extension structure and having generic function such as extension_version(xml). This would save us from having to bloat PHP by adding

Re: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/

2001-06-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
Maybe we should wait with this whole API change until a new sub-version? 4.1? Or keep the old functionality right now and just add the new functions? We can deprecate the old ones in 4.1. Andi At 03:03 PM 6/24/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: Since everybody seems to be using some stupid

Re: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/

2001-06-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 08:21 PM 6/24/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: What new functionality? Why the hell should the API change? Only the function names should have been changed, not break the whole extension! It's a rewrite which is more in the PHP spirit. i.e. return true/false and not -1/0 and stuff like that

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #11620 Updated: PHP has encountered an Access Violation at 012D24B6

2001-06-26 Thread Andi Gutmans
Do you have a short reproducing script which makes your server hang? Andi At 02:07 PM 6/25/2001 -0400, Dean Limbaugh wrote: Yes, I installed 4.0.6 this AM and it's still happening. PHP has encountered an Access Violation at 013124B6 Error log entry The HTTP server encountered an unhandled

Re: [PHP-DEV] Support Apache 1.3.6 or not?

2001-06-26 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:17 PM 6/25/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote: On Monday, June 25, 2001, at 06:58 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote: This happens because of your patch. What is the use of -S anyway? :) Could you please check this out? -S sets the value of an

[PHP-DEV] Re: possible bug zend_hash_sort(...)

2001-06-26 Thread Andi Gutmans
Yep I agree. It can sense to sort a one element array because it might be coming from an external source. Andi At 04:47 PM 6/26/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote: I'd say that this is a bug, and needs to be fixed. Zeev At 15:40 26/6/2001, Andre Langhorst wrote: Hi, apparently php-users are

[PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

2001-06-27 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current upgrade isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it was in 4.0.6 until it gets a thorough make over? Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

2001-06-27 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 09:00 AM 6/27/2001 +0200, Christian Stocker wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current upgrade isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it was in 4.0.6 until

[PHP-DEV] CVS down!

2001-06-28 Thread Andi Gutmans
Guys, We are moving the CVS tree to a different server so please don't commit anything in the next few hours. Once it's up and running we'll post a message including the IP of the new machine (in case the DNS change doesn't propagate early enough for you). Andi -- PHP Development Mailing

Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM/XML in 4.0.7

2001-06-29 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 02:30 PM 6/27/2001 -0400, Colin Viebrock wrote: For 4.0.6 I rolled back the DOM/XML changes. It seems as if the current upgrade isn't being fixed. Maybe we should revert it back to what it was in 4.0.6 until it gets a thorough make over? You love to make me work, huh? :) Seriously, if

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

2001-06-29 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:14 PM 6/29/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: Well everyone would like to see it fixed but no one is fixing it. So we are better of rolling back. It means we will end up with one version and not three because we will roll back to 4.0.6. I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Dom XML

2001-06-30 Thread Andi Gutmans
I would like to roll it back to 4.0.6 until the current version gets fixed. However, I have not used either of them so that's why I'm waiting for enough feedback from people who actually use it. Andi At 03:12 PM 6/28/2001 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: Hello, as I about to write PHP scripts

Re: [PHP-DEV] Access 2000 Bug - Insert and Update statement does not work (no write access at all)

2001-07-03 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hi, I can't help you too much but I am pretty sure I bumped into problems after installing Access 2000 w/ an app which uses Access. I think the ODBC driver was changed in 2000. Maybe you can find something at msdn.microsoft.com. If you find anything useful please let me know. Andi At 05:25

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.1 or php 5.0

2001-07-05 Thread Andi Gutmans
I think both for Zend 2 and for the cleanup version of PHP (if they happen at the same time or not) it is important to come up with how to do the development. We can either work in a branch or create a new CVS tree. They both have their pros cons, but especially for the PHP CVS which is a

Re: [PHP-DEV] want to be dev

2001-07-05 Thread Andi Gutmans
Nabeel, Please contact the PHP documentation group at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I'm sure many people will be glad to have an Arabic version of the documentation and I'm sure the PHP Documentation team can get you started. Andi At 05:04 PM 7/5/2001 +, Nabeel

Re: [PHP-DEV] new/different problem in shutdown

2001-07-05 Thread Andi Gutmans
Thies, The patch you supplied looks like it's heading in the right direction but it is incorrect as not all of the stack is zval's. I'll try and take a look at it tomorrow (no time now). I think we can probably fix up your patch a bit and make it work with nested functions. In any case, if I

Re: [PHP-DEV] new/different problem in shutdown

2001-07-06 Thread Andi Gutmans
Thies, I have thought about your problem. Your patch fixed your test case but it won't fix all test cases. It is pretty much impossible to make sure on bailout (including exit() and errors) that all of the reference counts of the variables will go down to 0 even if we clean the call stack.

Re: [PHP-DEV] new/different problem in shutdown

2001-07-06 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 04:31 PM 7/6/2001 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:12:07PM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: Thies, I have thought about your problem. Your patch fixed your test case but it won't fix all test cases. It is pretty much impossible to make sure on bailout (including

Re: [PHP-DEV] new/different problem in shutdown

2001-07-06 Thread Andi Gutmans
, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:39:18PM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: At 04:31 PM 7/6/2001 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:12:07PM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: Thies, I have thought about your problem. Your patch fixed your test case but it won't fix all test cases

Re: [PHP-DEV] rtfm

2001-07-07 Thread Andi Gutmans
Yep looks like it. I think I just had a stale directory. Andi At 11:00 AM 7/7/2001 +0200, Martin Jansen wrote: On Sat, 07 Jul 2001 11:42:02 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: Didn't we decide on nuking ext/rtfm? Can I go ahead? Isn't this extension already removed? - Martin -- PHP Development

[PHP-DEV] rtfm

2001-07-07 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, Didn't we decide on nuking ext/rtfm? Can I go ahead? Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.1 or php 5.0

2001-07-07 Thread Andi Gutmans
Resending as we only got one answer... Andi Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:53:47 +0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED], php developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.1 or php 5.0 I think both for Zend 2 and for the cleanup

Re: [PHP-DEV] tsrm patch

2001-07-07 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hi, I commited a patch. Andi At 12:59 PM 7/7/2001 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: Hello, Sending this little fix to the dev group, since I don't beleive I have write access into TSRM. Can someone get this submitted? In tsrm_win32.c, line 138, change the +4 to +5 to allow for the trailing null

[PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-08 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, I think one thing that bothers PHP developers is when they do: include ../foo.inc; and in foo.inc they do: include bar.inc; That bar.inc is not searched for in foo.inc's current directory automatically. As we pretty much always have the expanded filename of the current executing script I

Re: [PHP-DEV] tsrm patch

2001-07-08 Thread Andi Gutmans
Shane, Can you please also have Daniel Beulshausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] take a look at it as he did the original patch. Also please try and send unified diffs (cvs diff -u). Thanks, Andi At 03:12 PM 7/8/2001 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: Hi Andi, Here is yet another patch to tsrm. The popen

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:02 AM 7/9/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: Hey, I think one thing that bothers PHP developers is when they do: include ../foo.inc; and in foo.inc they do: include bar.inc; That bar.inc is not searched for in foo.inc's current

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
I actually had in mind something like option #4 but not exactly what Zeev wrote. I thought that what we could do is if cwd and include_path fail then try and open at the same directory level as the currently executing script. I think it can be done but haven't completely checked it from a

RE: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
-Original Message- From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 9, 2001 5:48 AM To: Andi Gutmans Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0. Yeah, this has been requested several times. I think that changing the cwd

[PHP-DEV] Faster zend_hash

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
Guys, I've commited a patch for zend_hash.* in the Zend CVS branch PRE_NEW_HASH_FUNC_PATCH (yeah the branch name shouldn't be with the PRE ) which increases the speed of our hash tables significantly. Can you please try it out and see that it works for you and give me feedback if you notice a

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:24 AM 7/9/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: I'm talking about real-world cases of developers who stopped contributing or were afraid to contribute because of your sucky, condescending attitude. Uh? I don't recall a single instance of Sascha scaring someone off. I don't want to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 12:03 PM 7/9/2001 -0700, Vlad Krupin wrote: Is it better to break things once or twice? Ok, not completely break, but now I have some code working with PHP4, later I will have some code that will work with PHP4.1, and finally I will re-write it to work with the latest-and-best PHP5. It is

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:02 PM 7/9/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: I'd like to see Sascha's attitude change, ideally. Ok - Sascha, do you think that your attitude is a problem? I don't think that bears an answer considering the contents of this thread and the amount of people who outspoke

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:30 PM 7/9/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: Sascha, don't come to conclusions too quickly if you do want to improve your weak spots. Andi, have you ever considered that your approach of guiding other people is not appreciated? Yes. That is what a guide is. He can try and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:43 PM 7/9/2001 -0500, Brian Moon wrote: That is not completely true. If there is a file in the included scripts dir that has the same name as one in the including scripts dir, that would cause some unexpected problems. Well as I would only resort to looking according to the current file

Fwd: [PHP-DEV] Faster zend_hash

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
I'd appreciate if people tested this. To check it out go into your php4/Zend CVS tree and do: cvs update -r PRE_NEW_HASH_FUNC_PATCH Andi Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 21:24:22 +0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP-DEV] Faster zend_hash Guys, I've commited

Re: Fwd: [PHP-DEV] Faster zend_hash

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:47 PM 7/9/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: I'd appreciate if people tested this. To check it out go into your php4/Zend CVS tree and do: cvs update -r PRE_NEW_HASH_FUNC_PATCH And don't forget to cvs upd -A after you are done testing. Yep

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
-- dealnews.com, Inc. Makers of dealnews dealmac http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/ - Original Message - From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vlad Krupin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 04:04 PM 7/9/2001 -0500, Brian Moon wrote: It is not so much BC. It is more like unexpected new behavior. As of now, a bad programmer might have this: /www/site.com/include/file.php /www/site.com/include/config.php /www/site.com/index.php /www/site.com/config.php if index.php includes

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
and so on. Just an idea. I haven't thought about it too much and I've just opened my eyes from sleep :) Andi On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Sascha Schumann : At 10:30 PM 7/9/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: Sascha, don't come to conclusions too quickly if you

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 07:03 AM 7/10/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: I am still +1, but think it should be at least a 4.1 thing. Does others also think it should wait for 4.1 or later? If so I'll leave it I don't. But I consider this more as a bug than missing feature.. So it should be fixed ASAP. :) (there

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Working Groups

2001-07-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:24 PM 7/9/2001 -0700, Frank M. Kromann wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:51:14AM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: I think it's something we should consider. From what Joey wrote it sounds as if the PHP Group is perceived as something *above* php-dev in the community. I don't

[PHP-DEV] Re: Str enhancement, final run

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 06:00 PM 7/10/2001 +0200, André Langhorst wrote: As it were Andi's last words, is it the finial decison now just to implement $foo{x} to retrieve a single char? I'm asking this again, because it will be irreversible because it is not compatible with substr($foo,x) == $foo{x}!!! And as I

[PHP-DEV] zend_hash patch

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, Has anyone had a chance to check the zend_hash patch I wrote about yesterday? Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL

[PHP-DEV] Preliminary patch for allowing relative includes

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hi guys, Attached is a patch which I worked up quickly (could probably use some improving) which should solve the problem with includes of relative includes :) Simpler said: a.php - ?php include ../b.php; ? b.php - ?php include c.php; ? c.php - ?php print Yay! ? This example

Re: [PHP-DEV] Preliminary patch for allowing relative includes

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
You can nuke the fprintf() in the patch :) Andi At 08:24 PM 7/10/2001 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: Hi guys, Attached is a patch which I worked up quickly (could probably use some improving) which should solve the problem with includes of relative includes :) Simpler said: a.php - ?php

Re: [PHP-DEV] zend_hash patch

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:07 PM 7/10/2001 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:54:13PM +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:43:12PM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote: Hey, Has anyone had a chance to check the zend_hash patch I wrote about yesterday? seems

Re: [PHP-DEV] Preliminary patch for allowing relative includes

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
... The last resort will be the c.php in b.php's directory. So it will include the one in the a.php directory. Andi thanks, Vlad Andi Gutmans wrote: Hi guys, Attached is a patch which I worked up quickly (could probably use some improving) which should solve the problem with includes of relative

[PHP-DEV] Re: php4 /main fopen_wrappers.c

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 12:13 AM 7/11/2001 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: - Right now this also effects things like opening php.ini. It'll now always check in the current working directory for php.ini. I think this doesn't screw up todays behavior. Isn't this a huge security risk? When there is

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/dom/php_domxml.c patch

2001-07-10 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 07:00 PM 7/10/2001 -0400, Paul Marquis wrote: Attached is a patch to ext/dom/php_domxml.c that adds the ability to set the context node when running xpath_eval(). xpath_eval() (and xpath_eval_expression()) can now accept and optional second parameter that is the context node. If no argument

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/dom/php_domxml.c patch

2001-07-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
in on some memory leaks...Paul, if possible, I may want to collaborate with you some, because we seem to be working in the same areas of the code, and I could use the help. On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Paul Marquis and...: At 07:00 PM 7/10/2001 -0400, Paul Marquis wrote

Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible feature for current version of PHP or PHP 4.1/5.0.

2001-07-11 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:19 AM 7/12/2001 +0200, Piotr Pawlow wrote: Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am -1 on yet another new function. Because, if you create a new include_local or whatever, people are gonna want include_local_once and so on and so forth. What do you say about include local($str),

Re: [PHP-DEV] Help with corrupted defines [bug 11990]

2001-07-12 Thread Andi Gutmans
Brian, In order to debug this you'd really need to try and cut it down to a smaller reproducible script. Maybe the best start for you is to compile with --enable-debug and see if you get any error messages from the memory manage in your error_log file about memory overruns and stuff. That

Re: [PHP-DEV] Is this a bug?

2001-07-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:47 AM 7/20/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: ?php class foo { function bar() { print 'bar() calledbr'; } } $foo = new foo(); $bar = $foo; $method = 'bar'; $foo-$method; // does not work

Re: [PHP-DEV] Is this a bug?

2001-07-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 02:31 PM 7/20/2001 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote: $foo-$method; // does not work $bar-$method; // does not work This should be $foo-$method() and $bar-$method() Gotcha. This works fine. How could I forget

Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving output.c from ext/standard to main/

2001-07-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
I only know of commercial products such as Rational Clearcase (which is far superior to CVS but very expensive) that handle stuff like directory versioning in a great way. It's not suitable for open-source projects though. I also check into the tigris homepage every couple of months who are

Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving output.c from ext/standard to main/

2001-07-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 12:27 PM 7/20/2001 -0400, Jon Parise wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 04:14:21PM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote: It's been bugging me for over a year now, and I'm now trying to figure out the best way to do it. output.c sits today in ext/standard, which is wrong, as it's really a part of the

Fwd: [PHP-DEV] * New Parameter Parsing Functions *

2001-07-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
Guys, Andrei sent this Email a while ago and I don't remember anyone giving feedback. We'd be happy to hear what people think about this new parameter API in the Zend Engine. I think it has good potential especially for simplifying functions which accept read-only arguments (which is the case

Re: [PHP-DEV] parent/super??

2001-07-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:03 PM 7/20/2001 -0600, Chris Newbill wrote: Hope I am not opening a can of worms here, but... Did anything become final on whether or not super::foo() would work? I'm looking through the mail list archives and can't find a definate answer. If the answer is 'no', that's fine I can work

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >