[PHP-DEV] JFYI: domxml memory leak

2002-05-18 Thread Christian Stocker
Hi For all of those, who don't read the bug-list: domxml had a pretty big memory leak in 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 if you use append_child/add_child/append_sibling. If you create big XML-Documents with those functions, you are really urged to try the new version from CVS, which should fix the problem.

Re: [PHP-DEV] JFYI: domxml memory leak

2002-05-18 Thread derick
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Christian Stocker wrote: [...] Anyway, is there ever going to be a 4.2.2 release, or will the next release be 4.3 (and i can stop MFHing :) )? It's still unsure if there will be a 4.2.2, so please continue merging. Derick

[PHP-DEV] domxml questions

2002-05-18 Thread Rob Richards
I have been going through the latest domxml extension and have a few questions about it. Looking at the docs, it is indicated that set_content and get_content are depreciated. The new functions from the docs, however, do not really make sense. set_content - Create a new node with e.g.

Re: [PHP-DEV] domxml questions

2002-05-18 Thread Lukas Schroeder
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 10:05:32AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote: I have been going through the latest domxml extension and have a few questions about it. Looking at the docs, it is indicated that set_content and get_content are depreciated. set_content - Create a new node with e.g.

[PHP-DEV] PHP as an ActiveScript Engine

2002-05-18 Thread Wez Furlong
Hey, I've been doing some tinkering over the last 24 hours and I've implemented IActiveScript (and friends) as a SAPI for win32/IE. What does that mean?? Well, it means that you can do things like this: (in IE) html ... script language=ActivePHP function clickit() {

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP as an ActiveScript Engine

2002-05-18 Thread Harald Radi
the more code i see the more ideas i have ;) harald. Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hey, I've been doing some tinkering over the last 24 hours and I've implemented IActiveScript (and friends) as a SAPI for win32/IE. What

Re: [PHP-DEV] domxml questions

2002-05-18 Thread Christian Stocker
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Lukas Schroeder wrote: On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 10:05:32AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote: I have been going through the latest domxml extension and have a few questions about it. Looking at the docs, it is indicated that set_content and get_content are depreciated.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Safe Mode

2002-05-18 Thread Kristian Koehntopp
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:46:42AM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote: In a perfect world, ISPs would have used chroot'd environments always, running either CGI's We do. On earth. Kristian -- Kristian Köhntopp, NetUSE AG, Dr.-Hell-Straße, D-24107 Kiel Tel: +49 431 386 435 00, Fax: +49 431 386 435

Re: [PHP-DEV] domxml questions

2002-05-18 Thread Rob Richards
So then can I safely assume that the functions arent really depreciated then? If the functions were to be depreciated there really isn't a replacement for them implemented yet. As far as the set_node_value, I had just mentioned that as according to the docs the functions were being depreciated

[PHP-DEV] one of the php.net machines is down

2002-05-18 Thread Jim Winstead
one of the php.net machines (the one that handles php.net mail, bugs.php.net, hosts.php.net, and various other services) is currently down. we're waiting on word from the folks hosting the machine to find out what's up. hopefully things will be back up and running soon, but it could take until