[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

On 2001-30-12 05:53, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? > > Well, no php-dev people is engaged to know DocBook XML, the > doc building process, or translation related things. No phpdoc people > engaged to know C, some know very few C, or have

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

> Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? Well, no php-dev people is engaged to know DocBook XML, the doc building process, or translation related things. No phpdoc people engaged to know C, some know very few C, or have no experience with C at all. I have seen a note

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Obviously, you shouldn't have taken this mail too seriously. > > Did you!? ;-) We expect on serious postings only serious responses. The best thing we can do is to do nothing. -Egon -- PHP Development Mailing List To

Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Obviously, you shouldn't have taken this mail too seriously. Did you!? ;-) On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:17:11PM +0100, Wolfgang Drews wrote : > > Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and > > ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the > > function calls

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

> Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and > ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the > function calls by Hartmut (thx!) but yet they aren't really > documented. Gread idea, no? You should read my mail carefully before getting funny. What i wrote " Do no

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:43:32PM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote : > From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? > > If we get no information there will be no documentation. I see the > faqt, that extension authors aren´t able o

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? If we get no information there will be no documentation. I see the faqt, that extension authors aren´t able or will not write correct prototype folding hooks. Please read yourself CODI

Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list

Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the function calls by Hartmut (thx!) but yet they aren't really documented. Gread idea, no? And, alas you said you don't listen to this answer: You can't force anyone t

[PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Hi, this one goes out to you Coder! My wishes for the next year are simple and easy to understand - PLEASE DOCCUMENT YOUR CODE! Ask yourself, for who you are coding. You give your sparetime to code things for PHP, and i think you do this, because you will bring it on. Do you r