Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

Yep :) At 13:53 30/11/2001, Markus Fischer wrote: >On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:40:54PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote : > > Nope :) > > But you can update the NEWS file to say '4.1' and not '4.0' > at the top X-D > > - Markus > >-- >PHP Development Mailing List >To uns

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

How about in future to avoid this happening when we roll the release tag as 4.1.0 or whatever call the tar.gz file php-4.1.0pre1.tar.gz then it becomes slightly more obvious its not 4.1.0 also all we then have to do is rename php-4.1.0pre1 to php-4.1.0.tar.gz to do the release no need to reroll wh

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:40:54PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote : > Nope :) But you can update the NEWS file to say '4.1' and not '4.0' at the top X-D - Markus -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-m

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

Nope :) At 09:19 30/11/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote: >As a minor cosmetic detail, could you set the version for >the 'next' release of 4.1 to be 4.1.1 ? > >Many people have downloaded the broken 'release' of 4.1.0 now >so we have to be able to know what version people are using >when they submit bu

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

As a minor cosmetic detail, could you set the version for the 'next' release of 4.1 to be 4.1.1 ? Many people have downloaded the broken 'release' of 4.1.0 now so we have to be able to know what version people are using when they submit bug reports. --Jani -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

Hi, On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:49:19 +0100 Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:16:02PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote : > > Can you verify that this problem is gone in the latest CVS of > > PHP_4_0_7 (make sure you update the Zend directory) > > Yes, it seems to wo

RE: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

Title: RE: [PHP-DEV] BC problem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > IMO, also include the few fixes after RC3 was rolled. I agree.  Mike Robinson  IT / Developer - Toronto Star TV  Phone: 416.945.8786  Fax: 416.869.4566  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.torontostar

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

OTECTED]> >Cc: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andi Gutmans" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:14 AM >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem > > > > I don't believe so. They should be

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

ROTECTED]> To: "Brian Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem > I don't beli

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Brian Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:09 AM >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC p

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

n Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:09 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem | Ok then, looks like we got ourselves a winner. We'll have an RC4 after all :I | I'll submit the patches to revert this change and roll RC4 today.

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Ok then, looks like we got ourselves a winner. We'll have an RC4 after all :I > I'll submit the patches to revert this change and roll RC4 today. I want > to hear opinions on whether this RC4 should be based on the RC3 tag, or > whether it should als

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:16:02PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote : > Can you verify that this problem is gone in the latest CVS of PHP_4_0_7 > (make sure you update the Zend directory) Yes, it seems to work: $ ~/isrc/cvs/test/php4/php -v 4.1.0 $ ~/isrc/cvs/test/php4/php -f include

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

Can you verify that this problem is gone in the latest CVS of PHP_4_0_7 (make sure you update the Zend directory) Zeev At 20:05 28/11/2001, Markus Fischer wrote: > A small example which shows that BC seems to be broken for a > certain (but not uncommon) case: > > cat include_me.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

> Ok then, looks like we got ourselves a winner. We'll have an RC4 > after all :I > I'll submit the patches to revert this change and roll RC4 today. I want > to hear opinions on whether this RC4 should be based on the RC3 tag, or > whether it should also include the few fixes that were submitte

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Ok then, looks like we got ourselves a winner. We'll have an RC4 after all :I > I'll submit the patches to revert this change and roll RC4 today. I want > to hear opinions on whether this RC4 should be based on the RC3 tag, or > whether it should also

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

Ok then, looks like we got ourselves a winner. We'll have an RC4 after all :I I'll submit the patches to revert this change and roll RC4 today. I want to hear opinions on whether this RC4 should be based on the RC3 tag, or whether it should also include the few fixes that were submitted to the

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

> > Did you check the 4.1.0 Zeev packaged? It was supposed to be backed out. I > don't have time to check now. Still present in this package. Similar script as brian: F:\PHP-41~1.0\RELEAS~2>php -q test.php hi Fatal error: Cannot redeclare test() in F:\PHP-41~1.0\RELEAS~2\include.php on line 10

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

At 11:04 PM 11/28/2001 -0600, Brian Moon wrote: >-snip- >With 4.0.6 I get: > >4.0.6 >test > >With 4.1 RC3 I get: > >4.1.0RC3 >Fatal error: Cannot redeclare test() in >/home/brian/public_html/include.php on line 9 > >with CVS I get: > >4.2.0-dev >Fatal error: Cannot redeclare test() (previously d

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brian Moon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:23 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem | Yep. As far as I remember it was reverted in 4.1.0 | |

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:23:55PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote : > Yep. As far as I remember it was reverted in 4.1.0 No, it doesn't seem to be reverted: $ ~/php410/bin/php -v 4.1.0 $ ~/php410/bin/php -f include_it.php 1 2 include_me.php(10) : Fatal error - C

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

> >Brian. > >- Original Message - >From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:05 AM >Subject: [PHP-DEV] BC problem > > > > A small example which shows that BC seems to be br

Re: [PHP-DEV] BC problem

D]> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] BC problem > A small example which shows that BC seems to be broken for a > certain (but not uncommon) case: > > cat include_me.php > if (!defined('I_AM_INCLUDED')) { >

[PHP-DEV] BC problem

A small example which shows that BC seems to be broken for a certain (but not uncommon) case: cat include_me.php \n"; return; } function cant_be_redefined() { } ?> cat include_it.php \n"; include 'include_me.php';