Re: [PHP-DEV] Important: "make test"/run-tests.php broken?

Btw, now (in HEAD) you can run "pear run-tests" in any directory with tests in it. No need for a makefile. - Stig On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 13:05, Markus Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > seems nothing happened there yet. CVS HEAD has the same > problem. Just deleting the CGI in ~/php4/php doe

Re: [PHP-DEV] Important: "make test"/run-tests.php broken?

Hi, seems nothing happened there yet. CVS HEAD has the same problem. Just deleting the CGI in ~/php4/php does the trick and runs the test suite properly. - Markus On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +, Wez Furlong wrote : > Damn - sapi/cgi is being run and the http head

Re: [PHP-DEV] Important: "make test"/run-tests.php broken?

Damn - sapi/cgi is being run and the http headers are confusing the test suite... --Wez. On 16/03/02, "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > Am I the only one that has every single test fail when running > make test?? > > (I've tried with 2 separate working checkouts). > > It app

[PHP-DEV] Important: "make test"/run-tests.php broken?

Hey, Am I the only one that has every single test fail when running make test?? (I've tried with 2 separate working checkouts). It appears that the expected output and the actual output differ by a newline at the end... Can someone else verify, because my first suspcicion was my streams code,

[PHP-DEV] IMPORTANT

Hah! Got you all :) Anyway: Hello everybody, I want to take this opportunity to wish you all a Happy New Year. Together with these wishes, I also wish you all happy and constructive discussions on these lists, where all different opinions are carefully considered and may lead to a renewed spiri

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

On 2001-30-12 05:53, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? > > Well, no php-dev people is engaged to know DocBook XML, the > doc building process, or translation related things. No phpdoc people > engaged to know C, some know very few C, or have

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

> Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? Well, no php-dev people is engaged to know DocBook XML, the doc building process, or translation related things. No phpdoc people engaged to know C, some know very few C, or have no experience with C at all. I have seen a note

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Obviously, you shouldn't have taken this mail too seriously. > > Did you!? ;-) We expect on serious postings only serious responses. The best thing we can do is to do nothing. -Egon -- PHP Development Mailing List To

Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Obviously, you shouldn't have taken this mail too seriously. Did you!? ;-) On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:17:11PM +0100, Wolfgang Drews wrote : > > Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and > > ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the > > function calls

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

> Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and > ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the > function calls by Hartmut (thx!) but yet they aren't really > documented. Gread idea, no? You should read my mail carefully before getting funny. What i wrote " Do no

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:43:32PM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote : > From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? > > If we get no information there will be no documentation. I see the > faqt, that extension authors aren´t able o

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? If we get no information there will be no documentation. I see the faqt, that extension authors aren´t able or will not write correct prototype folding hooks. Please read yourself CODI

Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Ah, and btw, that's what we've the documentation team for, no? -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list

Re: [PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Ok, we will start off with removing ext/socket and ext/domxml. Their manuel pages have been adapted with the function calls by Hartmut (thx!) but yet they aren't really documented. Gread idea, no? And, alas you said you don't listen to this answer: You can't force anyone t

[PHP-DEV] [IMPORTANT] wishes for php ...

Hi, this one goes out to you Coder! My wishes for the next year are simple and easy to understand - PLEASE DOCCUMENT YOUR CODE! Ask yourself, for who you are coding. You give your sparetime to code things for PHP, and i think you do this, because you will bring it on. Do you r

[PHP-DEV] IMPORTANT FOR YOU

Under Bill 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress, This letter cannot be considered Spam as long as we include: Contact information & a Remove Link. If not interested in the services offered, To be removed from future mailings just reply with 'REMOVE' in the subject line. Your requ