On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Jim Winstead wrote:
> we should either ditch this file, or update it to reflect the current
> process. (i'd almost prefer we just replace it with an entirely new
> document, perhaps based on derick's email[1], so we can have the
> document not be GPL'd, which is just silly.)
we should either ditch this file, or update it to reflect the current
process. (i'd almost prefer we just replace it with an entirely new
document, perhaps based on derick's email[1], so we can have the
document not be GPL'd, which is just silly.)
one way i'd amend the process, relating to the us
