From: "Yasuo Ohgaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joao Prado Maia wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> > Again, shouldn't the names comply with the (new?) coding
standards ?
> > pg_lo_import and pg_lo_export should be the names IMHO.
> >
> > I saw some other functions like pg_loclose
Joao Prado Maia wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Again, shouldn't the names comply with the (new?) coding standards ?
> pg_lo_import and pg_lo_export should be the names IMHO.
>
> I saw some other functions like pg_loclose and etc. Shouldn't they be
> changed also ?
Ok, I'll
Hi all,
I've messed up my request for comments last time.
I think some of you are expecting me to post again ;)
Some names are changed also.
I would like to here your comments about new function
names. I'll commit the change at once, since
async functions are commited already, other changes are
