[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-27 Thread James Moore
> Q: What about DocBook? > A: I don't have the neccessary knowledge for this, but I know some guys > that actually have it. Means, I've send some pizza's and beer crates to > send to them and make them feel guilty to help us ;). Help is very much > appreciated. What needs doing on this front?? -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-27 Thread Ulf Wendel
"Stig S. Bakken" wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > phpdoc itself or just this extension ? > > Just this extension. Hurry up and apply for a CVS account at > http://php.net/cvs-php.php :-) Ok, now that everybody commented on it, let me add my 2 Cents. I never stopped beliving in the im

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-25 Thread jan
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:16:38AM +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > Just this extension. Hurry up and apply for a CVS account at > http://php.net/cvs-php.php :-) done. > - Stig Jan -- mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] weigon @ #php.de (IRCnet) http://jan.kneschke.de weigon @ #modlogan (ope

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-24 Thread jan
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 09:19:15AM +0100, Ol wrote: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:17:18 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I've written a PHP-2-XML converter which is sitting directly on the > > Zend-parser. This gives us more speed and more accuracy. > > Difficult to do better in fact ... ;) Ri

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-24 Thread Stig S. Bakken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Andre Gildemeister wrote: > > hi, > > > > I have pursued the development of PHPDoc very interestedly. > > After the incorporation into the CVS Repository: php4/pear/PHPDoc I have > > heard nothing more new... > > > > - in the

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-23 Thread Ol
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:17:18 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've written a PHP-2-XML converter which is sitting directly on the > Zend-parser. This gives us more speed and more accuracy. Difficult to do better in fact ... ;) > It has been written because Ulf Wendel convinced me to do it by >

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-22 Thread jan
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 04:06:35PM +0100, Andre Gildemeister wrote: > hi, > > I have pursued the development of PHPDoc very interestedly. > After the incorporation into the CVS Repository: php4/pear/PHPDoc I have > heard nothing more new... > > - in the meantime was something to heard about a re

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-22 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
Andre Gildemeister wrote: > "Martin Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I don't see a good reason for that. >> >> > What speaks in principle against this? wrong direction we want to get things from ext to pear, not the other way -- Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-22 Thread Andre Gildemeister
"Martin Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see a good reason for that. > What speaks in principle against this? -Andre Gildemeister -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To c

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHPDoc Development Status

2001-11-22 Thread Martin Jansen
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:06:35 +0100, Andre Gildemeister wrote: >- shouldn't PHPDoc become an official extension either? (ext/phpdoc) I don't see a good reason for that. - Martin -- Martin Jansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.martin-jansen.de/ -- PHP Development Mailing List