Hallo Melvyn,
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 9:55:31 AM, you wrote:
At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
succeed. Is it really necessary to document
At 11:30 10/29/2002 +0100, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
documentation
about Apache 2 support.
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
marketing
trick the Apache Group is
Derick Rethans writes:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
documentation
that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
production ready
for Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying Do not use Apache 2 and PHP
As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
documentation
that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
production ready
for Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
production environment you don't blame any of the
I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
documentation
about Apache 2 support.
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
marketing
trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
We
