[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal for release process (Was: Re:[PHP-DEV]4.1.0)

2001-11-17 Thread Zeev Suraski
I think we should be realistic about what we can and cannot pull. Using this approach as the standard release process is simply not going to work - we barely manage an RC branch and a dev branch properly, and having to maintain an old release branch sync'd with bug fixes is not going to be

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal for release process (Was: Re:[PHP-DEV]4.1.0)

2001-11-15 Thread Stig S. Bakken
Andi Gutmans wrote: At 01:36 AM 11/14/2001 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote: I didn't quite understand what you mean :) All I said was that if you create a branch say 4.1.0 and you want to release 4.1.x from that branch later on whilst HEAD has already moved a couple of months you're

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal for release process (Was: Re:[PHP-DEV]4.1.0)

2001-11-13 Thread Stig S. Bakken
Andi Gutmans wrote: At 12:31 AM 11/11/2001 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote: Andi Gutmans wrote: Jani, I think in theory what you writes makes sense but it just doesn't work in the PHP project. (I'm talking about the minor versions coming out of branches). There are always cries

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal for release process (Was: Re:[PHP-DEV]4.1.0)

2001-11-13 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:36 AM 11/14/2001 +0100, Stig S. Bakken wrote: I didn't quite understand what you mean :) All I said was that if you create a branch say 4.1.0 and you want to release 4.1.x from that branch later on whilst HEAD has already moved a couple of months you're going to have a hard time