[PHP-DEV] Re: Change of cgi behaviour in 4.3.0

2002-09-25 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote: For some reason http status reporting has been changed in the current CVS version of PHP. This breaks PHP under IIS and possibly other servers. Please see http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=19207 for details. The reason is that it did not work

[PHP-DEV] Re: Change of cgi behaviour in 4.3.0

2002-09-25 Thread Edin Kadribasic
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:36:42 +0200 (CEST), Sascha Schumann wrote: On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote: For some reason http status reporting has been changed in the current CVS version of PHP. This breaks PHP under IIS and possibly other servers. Please see

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Change of cgi behaviour in 4.3.0

2002-09-25 Thread Zeev Suraski
Just to clear any doubts - was there any real-world problem with the way things were working before this change? Zeev At 10:26 25/09/2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote: On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:36:42 +0200 (CEST), Sascha Schumann wrote: On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote: For some reason

[PHP-DEV] Re: Change of cgi behaviour in 4.3.0

2002-09-25 Thread Sascha Schumann
This is probably the best solution to the problem. We just have to remember to explain the issue in the release notes when 4.3.0 gets released. Perhaps also make the old format default on Windows since probably most people use php-cgi with IIS. Well, I am not so certain about that --

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Change of cgi behaviour in 4.3.0

2002-09-25 Thread derick
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: Just to clear any doubts - was there any real-world problem with the way things were working before this change? Yes, there was a problem. I remember 'fixing' that, and there is also a bugreport about it which I can not find right now. Derick x= At

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Change of cgi behaviour in 4.3.0

2002-09-25 Thread Zeev Suraski
Ok, we need to make sure we're not creating a bigger problem with that fix. Zeev At 10:44 25/09/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: Just to clear any doubts - was there any real-world problem with the way things were working before this change? Yes,