[PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2002-01-02 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
Jon Parise wrote: > I think the following "standard" extensions should be moved to > PECL: > > ext/cybercash > ext/icap > ext/pfpro > ext/yaz > > This is definitely not an inclusive list; it's just a start. I > can't imagine a lot of people using these modules, so they seem > l

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2002-01-01 Thread Martin Jansen
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:09:51 -0800, Jim Winstead wrote: >i was thinking more along the lines of something that allowed the >documentation for an extension to be managed on its own, Documentation somewhere is better than documentation nowhere ;-). Anyways, I don't have a really strong opinion wh

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2002-01-01 Thread Jim Winstead
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:05:18PM +0100, Martin Jansen wrote: > On 31 Dec 2001 19:18:59 -, Jim Winstead wrote: > >Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice > >> or principle)? > > > >no objections, but one thing that should be

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2002-01-01 Thread Martin Jansen
On 31 Dec 2001 19:18:59 -, Jim Winstead wrote: >Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice >> or principle)? > >no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what happens >to the documentation for these extensions Th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2002-01-01 Thread Marcel Beerta
> > Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice > > or principle)? > > no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what happens > to the documentation for these extensions when they are no longer a part > of the core distribution. Documentation should really be

[PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2001-12-31 Thread August Zajonc
In conjunction with this, increasing the findability of the PECL might be a good idea. At the least an explict search at php.net either in "documentation" or "whole site" should result in at least one hit other than a changelog entry. - AZ - Original Message - From: "Jon Parise" <[EMAI

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2001-12-31 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
> look at the current situation with the mnogosearch extension -- 4.1.0 > and 4.1.1 don't support the latest mnogosearch api. it will probably be > at least three months before a distribution of php that does is > released. if mnogosearch were a part of PECL, a new version could be > released and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2001-12-31 Thread Jim Winstead
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:12:25PM -, James Moore wrote: > The QA Teams job needs to be made as easy as possible, at the moment those > people still working activly on QA a lot have a very hard time balancing > time between testing for new bugs, localising and fixing bugs as well as > making s

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2001-12-31 Thread James Moore
> Jim Winstead wrote: > > no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what > > happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no > > longer a part of the core distribution. > > QA too. > > "I suppose removing some of these less frequently used extensions will > a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2001-12-31 Thread Alexander Wagner
Jim Winstead wrote: > no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what > happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no > longer a part of the core distribution. QA too. "I suppose removing some of these less frequently used extensions will also help make the Q

[PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

2001-12-31 Thread Jim Winstead
Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice > or principle)? no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no longer a part of the core distribution. (an