- Original Message -
From: Daniel Beckham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: PHP pcntl function documentation (and other stuff)
- Original Message -
From: Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel
- Original Message -
From: Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Beckham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: PHP pcntl function documentation (and other stuff)
The system and exec (IMHO) are written very badly in PHP
One more question. Were you considering adding wait() to the list of
functions supported? I know it's very similar as waitpid(), but it is
simpler to use unless you are doing something more complex in nature.
Daniel
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Beckham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: PHP pcntl function documentation (and other stuff)
- Original Message -
From: Jason Greene [EMAIL
Yes I was debating on whether or not to add that, but I wasn't sure what people were
looking for.
I was also debating on adding wait3 and wait4.
so here are the functions that should be added
pcntl_exec()
pcntl_wait()
pcntl_vfork()
pcntl_wait3()???
pcntl_wait4()???
hmm.. maybee they should
I would say definitely yes to exec, vfork and wait4. Adding wait and wait3
isn't a huge priority, but it's worth putting them in there to round out the
list of functions available.
IMHO, if you are going for a one to one relationship between the system
functions and the pcntl library, I
