On Fri, 09 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> By the way, if you need something that works you can just add the following
> line in your constructor:
> $this->mystatic =& $GLOBALS["__myclass_mystatic"];
>
> Then use $this->mystatic in all of your methods. It's not built-in but it
> should work pre
By the way, if you need something that works you can just add the following
line in your constructor:
$this->mystatic =& $GLOBALS["__myclass_mystatic"];
Then use $this->mystatic in all of your methods. It's not built-in but it
should work pretty nicely.
Andi
At 11:02 AM 3/9/2001 -0600, Andrei
On Fri, 09 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yeah, it's supposed to be this way. We copied C++.
Ok, so I can rely on this behavior in the future. On a similar note,
what about static class variables, can those be done?
-Andrei
* What were the first 15 billion years of the universe like for you? *
On Fri, 09 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> We need to think of static class variables. I don't think it's very easy to
> do this in a way which wouldn't cause a general performance loss but I'll
> put on my thinking cap.
Ok, I was gonna try to hack it in myself, but you are obviously more
quali
At 10:59 AM 3/9/2001 -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > Yeah, it's supposed to be this way. We copied C++.
>
>Ok, so I can rely on this behavior in the future. On a similar note,
>what about static class variables, can those be done?
Yeah you can rely on t
Yeah, it's supposed to be this way. We copied C++.
Andi
At 10:50 AM 3/9/2001 -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>Just ran into something (well, actually searching for it) and wanted to
>know what everyone's thoughts on this were and whether it should stay
>that way.
>
>class Foo {
> function get(
