-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi;zend.com]
Sent: 30 October 2002 19:26
I think you guys have convinced me that having only isn't too bad
(Jason will kill me now).
Does anyone here on php-dev have any additional thoughts?
Well, although I think it's a good idea
I think you guys have convinced me that having only isn't too bad
(Jason will kill me now).
Does anyone here on php-dev have any additional thoughts?
I just want to point out that what convinced me wasn't the anyone who
knows twos complement would know that blah blah blah argument. Don't
We're going to walk into a confusion where people will expect to work
too, and get bitten. We have to be really careful that we explain it
properly.
-- james
I think you guys have convinced me that having only isn't too bad
(Jason will kill me now).
Does anyone here on php-dev have any
At 08:05 PM 10/30/2002 +, James Cox wrote:
We're going to walk into a confusion where people will expect to work
too, and get bitten. We have to be really careful that we explain it
properly.
That was my initial worry too.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 13:26, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think you guys have convinced me that having only isn't too bad
Great, I really think this is the way to go!
(Jason will kill me now)
/me kills Andi
Just kidding, I am just glad we can come to an agreement, so I can start
working on a
Ok,
I hereby volunteer to update the documentation to clearly explain
shifting (with examples).
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 14:05, James Cox wrote:
We're going to walk into a confusion where people will expect to work
too, and get bitten. We have to be really careful that we explain it
Jason T. Greene writes:
Ok,
I hereby volunteer to update the documentation to clearly
explain shifting (with examples).
Excellent!
That way, I can't stop losing sleep wondering what the heck
someone would need this stuff for. :)
Best Regards
Mike Robinson
--
PHP Development Mailing
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:51, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:49 PM 10/23/2002 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
The reality of twos-complement, bitwise arithmatic is that there are
three basic shift operations: shift left, bitwise shift right, and
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:49 PM 10/23/2002 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
The reality of twos-complement, bitwise arithmatic is that there are
three basic shift operations: shift left, bitwise shift right, and
arithmetic shift right. This simple fact is one of the basic
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Jason knows that my stand on this one is that if we have we really
should also have which will clash with here-docs. Suggestions for
other operators such as his are a possibility.
Wrong on two counts.
The reality of twos-complement, bitwise
At 02:49 PM 10/23/2002 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Jason knows that my stand on this one is that if we have we really
should also have which will clash with here-docs. Suggestions for
other operators such as his are a possibility.
Wrong on two
11 matches
Mail list logo
