Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 10:42 PM 12/29/2001 +0100, Stig Venaas wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> > I agree with Jim. Arrays can contain "things". Things can also be other
>> > arrays. You can have an array which contains two other arrays and four
>> >
At 10:42 PM 12/29/2001 +0100, Stig Venaas wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > I agree with Jim. Arrays can contain "things". Things can also be other
> > arrays. You can have an array which contains two other arrays and four
> > integers. I don't think we shou
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I agree with Jim. Arrays can contain "things". Things can also be other
> arrays. You can have an array which contains two other arrays and four
> integers. I don't think we should add these functions because they are
> wrong *espe
At 09:06 PM 12/29/2001 +, Jim Winstead wrote:
>Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Log:
> > - Added extra parameter to count() that recursively counts elements in an
> >array and added is_array_multidimensional(). (patch by Vlad Bosinceanu
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>do we r
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log:
> - Added extra parameter to count() that recursively counts elements in an
>array and added is_array_multidimensional(). (patch by Vlad Bosinceanu
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
do we really want to perpetuate this idea that a multidimensional ar
