+1
At 04:06 AM 2/8/2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that I'm doing exactly that.
Filtering that annoying noise to other folder. :)
Which I unfortunately don't have time to read atm.
And I actually have turned my coat on this issue and I'm
in favor
-1 :) For the reasons mentioned every six months when this matter is raised.
At 02:49 PM 2/8/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
+1
At 04:06 AM 2/8/2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that I'm doing exactly that.
Filtering that annoying noise to other folder. :)
Do you filter these? :)
I didn't do that before, but now that I am doing it, it makes
following php-dev@ a LOT easier.
--Jani
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
-1 :) For the reasons mentioned every six months when this matter is raised.
At 02:49 PM 2/8/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 03:04 PM 2/8/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Do you filter these? :)
I didn't do that before, but now that I am doing it, it makes
following php-dev@ a LOT easier.
I do :) But I still think that people subscribed to php-dev@ need to not
only enjoy upsides but also the downsides of
At 03:13 PM 2/8/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:04 PM 2/8/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Do you filter these? :)
I didn't do that before, but now that I am doing it, it makes
following php-dev@ a LOT easier.
I do :) But I still think that people subscribed to php-dev@ need to not
only enjoy
At 03:15 PM 2/8/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 03:13 PM 2/8/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:04 PM 2/8/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Do you filter these? :)
I didn't do that before, but now that I am doing it, it makes
following php-dev@ a LOT easier.
I do :) But I still think that people
Exactly same for me. I should have started doing this a long time ago..
--Jani
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Do you filter these? :)
I didn't do that before, but now that I am doing it, it makes
following php-dev@ a LOT easier.
I filter bug reports to a separate folder as
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I believe that in the scenario where php-dev@ is sent bug reports as
opposed to people having to subscribe separately to php-bugs@ the amount of
people reading bug reports in the first case will be bigger than in the
second. This is because I believe there
Someone suggested having php-bugs set up, and anyone with the relevant karma
would automatically be on it. if it was closed subscribtion/unsubscription,
then when someone gives karma, they also subscribe the person to that list.
Perhaps that's a solution, to seperate it. Yes, filters are good,
At 02:16 PM 2/8/2002 +, James Cox wrote:
Someone suggested having php-bugs set up, and anyone with the relevant karma
would automatically be on it. if it was closed subscribtion/unsubscription,
then when someone gives karma, they also subscribe the person to that list.
Perhaps that's a
Yeah, this was on my original email too.. :)
(being mandatory for anyone with cvs access..and the archive thing)
--Jani
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:16 PM 2/8/2002 +, James Cox wrote:
Someone suggested having php-bugs set up, and anyone with the relevant
Hallo,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
And I actually have turned my coat on this issue and I'm
in favor for separating the bug emails to own list.
Two good reasons:
- People who don't want to read them filter them out anyway
- It makes php-dev easier to
12 matches
Mail list logo
