abling the smaller
> modules makes little/no footprint/speed differences especially on the
> apache side.
>
> Anyways, hoping to get this box back in shape so I can get some work
> done.
>
> - AZ
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
- AZ
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:05 PM
To: August
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Simple Apache 1.3 vs 2.0 benchmarks
Uh, but did you benchmark straight cgi's between the two servers? How
about straigh
Uh, but did you benchmark straight cgi's between the two servers? How
about straight static pages?
Why would you automatically attribute the difference in performance to DSO
vs. static issues? It is pretty well known that Apache2 is currently
slower than Apache1 for stuff like this because of
#include as usual, all normal benchmark disclaimers.
This is -dev, so let's assume folks have a grasp of the gap between
performance benchmarking and the real world. Before flaming please give
credit to folks who are able to use this information in a larger and
broader context, while recognizing
