Title: RE: [PHP-DEV] The new design
I like the new design, but it is critically flawed.
In Netscape 4.75 linux and windows, Cut and Paste ability is
no longer available for code samples. I've learned to rely
heavily on cut and pasting PHP sample code when working with
functionality
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 07:17:42PM +0100, Björn Schotte wrote:
> * Jim Winstead wrote:
> > the reason i don't mind seeing it gone from the main page is that i think
> > having two search-like boxes on the same page that behave differently is
> > confusing.
>
> Have a look at http://www.php-center
At 19:47 8/3/2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
>but maybe the 'search' box in the header should really be a quickref box.
>that seems more likely to pull up what most people want. if someone wants
>to do an actual search for a function name on other pages, they'd then
>have to go to the search page and se
* Jim Winstead wrote:
> the reason i don't mind seeing it gone from the main page is that i think
> having two search-like boxes on the same page that behave differently is
> confusing.
Have a look at http://www.php-center.de/ - on the left
side, there's the normal search box, on the right side
t
(cc'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] please continue this
discussion there.)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Zeev
Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I generally like the new design, but this statement appears to be trying
> to fix the symptom, instead of the problem itself. If so many people
> miss the
>If you read the second paragraph of the "New Site Design" headline,
>you'll see that the quickref widget is still available on the manual
>pages.
Haven't seen it! Sorry! But I still miss the page, where I could see all
functions in one list, instead of going into MySQL and first there find all
M
At 18:00 8/3/2001, Jon Parise wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 04:57:32PM +0100, Johan Holst Nielsen wrote:
>
> > > Can we get the Quick Ref up again??
> >
> > >This list isn't really for this kind of discussion, but why not just use
> > >http://php.net/ - replace with something relevant.
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 04:57:32PM +0100, Johan Holst Nielsen wrote:
> > Can we get the Quick Ref up again??
>
> >This list isn't really for this kind of discussion, but why not just use
> >http://php.net/ - replace with something relevant.
>
> I think there is a problem. I can about all PHP c
-Original Message-
From: Johan Holst Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 8. marts 2001 15:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: [PHP-DEV] The new design
> Can we get the Quick Ref up again??
>This list isn't really for this kind of discussion, but why not just use
>
-Original Message-
From: Johan Holst Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 8. marts 2001 15:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: [PHP-DEV] The new design
> Can we get the Quick Ref up again??
This list isn't really for this kind of discussion, but why not just use
http:/
On Thu, 08 Mar 2001, Varun Shoor wrote:
> This is really not the good approach... when couple of people in #php
> were talking about a new redesigned PHP site, i was expecting a much
> better.. and good looking site not like one that is up currently. I
> miss almost every feature.. those quickref
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne
af Varun ShoorSendt: 9. marts 2001 04:12Til:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Emne: [PHP-DEV] The new
design
This is really not the good approach... when
couple of people in #php were talking about a new redesigned PHP site, i was
expecting a much better.. and go
This is really not the good approach... when couple
of people in #php were talking about a new redesigned PHP site, i was expecting
a much better.. and good looking site not like one that is up currently. I miss
almost every feature.. those quickref things.. those DHTML popups... that sweet
13 matches
Mail list logo
