Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning

> Hello, > > I'm for the 3 number-without-patchlevel idea. > > Derick me to! [...rest of TOFU removed...] -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning

I'm for STFU :) Zeev -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning

Hello, I'm for the 3 number-without-patchlevel idea. Derick On 14 Mar 2002, Jason Greene wrote: > Doesn't it make more since to release a version where one of the numbers > is a bugfix number? > > ex currently we have: [ Huge.Major.Minor ] > > and then when bugs are fixed they are: [ Huge.M

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning

No, it's not like it's been done from day one so it can't work... This is how it's done always.. etc. --Jani On 14 Mar 2002, Jason Greene wrote: >Doesn't it make more since to release a version where one of the numbers >is a bugfix number? > >ex currently we

[PHP-DEV] Versioning

Doesn't it make more since to release a version where one of the numbers is a bugfix number? ex currently we have: [ Huge.Major.Minor ] and then when bugs are fixed they are: [ Huge.Major.Minor pl Bugfix ] Hardly ever is a version released without a bugfix of some sort. I have seen the argum

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stig Sæther Bakken)] > [Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > > > >+1, perhaps from an api perspective we could have something like: > > > > > >$vn = php_get_version(GD); > > > > > >or if the argument is empty, retur

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

[Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > >+1, perhaps from an api perspective we could have something like: > > > >$vn = php_get_version(GD); > > > >or if the argument is empty, return the main php version: > > > >$phpVer = php_get_vers

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

Hi, > >Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is > >a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something to > >check if GD supports GIF/PNG/etc. This way, you can check the version and > >the optional parts. > > You mean this: > http://www.ph

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Stig Bakken wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sander Steffann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > PHP_VERSION_NUM > > > > +1 from me too. > > > > > Example: > > > GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201 > > > > Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is > > a built-i

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sander Steffann wrote: > Hi, > > > PHP_VERSION_NUM > > +1 from me too. > > > Example: > > GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201 > > Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is > a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

Hi, > PHP_VERSION_NUM +1 from me too. > Example: > GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201 Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something to check if GD supports GIF/PNG/etc. This way, you can check the versi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

Hello, hrm, I swear I saw this before... but I say again that I think this is a very good idea, this weill make BC much less probably, for example, I still remember the probs with the DOMXML extension... +2 Derick On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote: > v.m.b = v * 1 + m * 100 + b >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)

On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > I was thinking of PEAR too, don't worry. :) > But the versioning scheme/rules for PHP must be strict. > > Consider following: > > We have a numeric version constant: > > PHP_VERSION_NUM > > the value for this is calculated with this simple formula: >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent due to lack of replies)

Hello, a +2 for me... I still remember having making checks for the DOM XML module Derick On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Alexander Wirtz wrote: > A huge +1 from me. > > As of now, I'm using a regular expression to see, if the PHP-Version is apt > to be used with the scripts I write and this is not a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning (resent due to lack of replies)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A huge +1 from me. As of now, I'm using a regular expression to see, if the PHP-Version is apt to be used with the scripts I write and this is not a good thing, as it is too complicated. A versioncheck should be simple and quick to implement. For

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning, again (was: RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: PHP is not case sensitive?)

[Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > [this is more php-dev stuff, thus moved there] > > Warning: > > This is yet another beaten up issue but as it still hasn't > been fixed, we need to find a solution to fix it. > > > Problems: > > Viability, BBC, WTFF, old extensions used with new PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] Versioning, again (was: RE: [Zend Engine 2] Re: PHPis not case sensitive?)

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote: > Proposals: > > My proposal is that first we come up with a versioning scheme > with which everybody can agree on. Then we can release this > scheme to 'public' and hopefully not have to discuss/fight > about this again. > > > Examples: > > >h