> Not true, I've been using it, it works fine, I'm not quite sure
> about that bug though (too tired now to check it out also... :)
Well, when you *do* get some sleep :) ... take a look at the bug I posted:
http://bugs.php.net/?id=14521
I can see how the extension would be useable, if you never
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
>
> > Is anyone reading this list? I haven't heard a thing since last week when I
> > posted what I think might be a serious bug in the extension (see also
> > http://bugs.php.net/?id=14521).
> >
>
> I guess people just didn't try the extension ye
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
> Is anyone reading this list? I haven't heard a thing since last week when I
> posted what I think might be a serious bug in the extension (see also
> http://bugs.php.net/?id=14521).
>
I guess people just didn't try the extension yet. I'm also intere
Is anyone reading this list? I haven't heard a thing since last week when I
posted what I think might be a serious bug in the extension (see also
http://bugs.php.net/?id=14521).
Basically, you define a method. When executed, the server passes it the
appropriate parameters. However, what is rea
