Re: [PHP-DEV] cvs build issues

2002-07-22 Thread derick
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote: > Derick > > Smart-ass :P > > If you notice the next line is the libtool check which points out version > 1.4.1... which is why I'm confused. doh... I should sleep more :) Derick > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hey Dan, > > >

Re: [PHP-DEV] cvs build issues

2002-07-22 Thread Dan Kalowsky
Derick Smart-ass :P If you notice the next line is the libtool check which points out version 1.4.1... which is why I'm confused. On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey Dan, > > libtool 1.4 is required a long time now... atleast four months. Dunno > why you get this error now :) >

Re: [PHP-DEV] cvs build issues

2002-07-21 Thread derick
Hey Dan, libtool 1.4 is required a long time now... atleast four months. Dunno why you get this error now :) Derick On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote: > I might be a little crazy in the head, or really confused... but this new > PHP behavior just baffles me (and I've only been gone for

[PHP-DEV] cvs build issues

2002-07-21 Thread Dan Kalowsky
I might be a little crazy in the head, or really confused... but this new PHP behavior just baffles me (and I've only been gone for 2 weeks): dank@idoru ./buildconf using default Zend directory buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok) buildconf: automake version