Re: [PHP-DEV] ext_skel and php_.c vs. .c

Jon Parise wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:42PM -0600, Joey Smith wrote: > > > I had thought the decision was that php_.c was the correct way > > to name the .c file for an extension, so that we are less likely to > > conflict with any files from the package itself? > > > > ext_skel cre

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext_skel and php_.c vs. .c

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:42PM -0600, Joey Smith wrote: > I had thought the decision was that php_.c was the correct way > to name the .c file for an extension, so that we are less likely to > conflict with any files from the package itself? > > ext_skel creates a .c file using the bare extn

[PHP-DEV] ext_skel and php_.c vs. .c

I had thought the decision was that php_.c was the correct way to name the .c file for an extension, so that we are less likely to conflict with any files from the package itself? ext_skel creates a .c file using the bare extname. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubs