Shane:
I just want to say it's good to hear from you again! :)
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Shane Caraveo wrote the following to Andi Gutmans :
Hi Andi,
Here is yet another patch to tsrm. The popen implementation was
broken. You could not write to a process because pclose did not wait
Hi Andi,
Here is yet another patch to tsrm. The popen implementation was
broken. You could not write to a process because pclose did not wait
for a process to end, and the executed process could hang, because both
sides of the pipe were inheritable.
Index: tsrm_win32.c
Shane,
Can you please also have Daniel Beulshausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] take a look
at it as he did the original patch.
Also please try and send unified diffs (cvs diff -u).
Thanks,
Andi
At 03:12 PM 7/8/2001 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Hi Andi,
Here is yet another patch to tsrm. The popen
Hello,
Sending this little fix to the dev group, since I don't beleive I have
write access into TSRM. Can someone get this submitted?
In tsrm_win32.c, line 138, change the +4 to +5 to allow for the trailing
null character:
- cmd = (char*)malloc(strlen(command)+strlen(TWG(comspec))+4);
+ cmd
Hi,
I commited a patch.
Andi
At 12:59 PM 7/7/2001 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Hello,
Sending this little fix to the dev group, since I don't beleive I have
write access into TSRM. Can someone get this submitted?
In tsrm_win32.c, line 138, change the +4 to +5 to allow for the trailing
null
