At 16:49 12.11.2002, Jon Parise wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote:
Yes when i introduce a problem with win32 build i have to wait
up to 4 hours until i can see the problem and try to fix it. Then
i have to wait 4 more hours to see whther i did it
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 07:41, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Any objections to changing timestamp timezone on source snaps to UTC?
Windows snapshots are already using it.
Would be nice to have...
Ok. From now on snapshot filename should contain
At 09:12 12.11.2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 07:41, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Any objections to changing timestamp timezone on source snaps to UTC?
Windows snapshots are already using it.
Would be nice to have...
Ok. From
At 23:13 11.11.2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Monday 11 November 2002 23:07, James Cox wrote:
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
I use date -u +%Y%m%d%H00 for windows snapshots. It will show date in UTC.
Is it possible to
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote:
Yes when i introduce a problem with win32 build i have to wait
up to 4 hours until i can see the problem and try to fix it. Then
i have to wait 4 more hours to see whther i did it correctly
That sounds sort of like a separate
At 16:49 12.11.2002, Jon Parise wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote:
Yes when i introduce a problem with win32 build i have to wait
up to 4 hours until i can see the problem and try to fix it. Then
i have to wait 4 more hours to see whther i did it
Is it possible to increase build time from 4 hours to 2 hours
and use a time format that displays the timezone?
marcus
At 00:34 11.11.2002, James Cox wrote:
Snaps are back!
The snapserver is back up and alive, with both unix and win32 snaps...
-- james
--
James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
-- james
Is it possible to increase build time from 4 hours to 2 hours
and use a time format that displays the timezone?
marcus
At 00:34 11.11.2002, James Cox wrote:
Snaps are back!
The
On Monday 11 November 2002 23:07, James Cox wrote:
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
I use date -u +%Y%m%d%H00 for windows snapshots. It will show date in UTC.
Is it possible to increase build time from 4 hours to 2 hours
and
On November 11, 2002 05:07 pm, James Cox wrote:
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
date -R | sed -e 's/ /_/g'
Would be the best format IMHO.
Ilia
-- james
Is it possible to increase build time from 4 hours to 2 hours
and
On Monday 11 November 2002 23:14, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 11, 2002 05:07 pm, James Cox wrote:
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
date -R | sed -e 's/ /_/g'
Would be the best format IMHO.
Nice format but it doesn't sort well
On November 11, 2002 05:16 pm, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Monday 11 November 2002 23:14, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 11, 2002 05:07 pm, James Cox wrote:
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
date -R | sed -e 's/ /_/g'
Would
On Monday 11 November 2002 23:20, Ilia A. wrote:
Nice format but it doesn't sort well in directory listings :)
True, but we only have about a dosen files and with a human readable format
directory file sorting is not as relevant IMHO.
I disagree. The task of picking the latest sapshot (or
of course,
all this can be achieved with some simple apache magic...
-- james
On Monday 11 November 2002 23:20, Ilia A. wrote:
Nice format but it doesn't sort well in directory listings :)
True, but we only have about a dosen files and with a human
readable format
directory file
Well there are a number of issues. First of all current snapshot listing is a
regular apache directory listing, which causes files with names longer then X
amount of characters to be cut off. If we decide to add any readable
timestamp to the file we'd need to use some PHP script to display the
Ilia,
be my guest...
-- james
-Original Message-
From: Ilia A. [mailto:ilia;prohost.org]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:30 PM
To: Edin Kadribasic; James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Php-Dev
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps
Well there are a number of issues. First of all
Ilia A. wrote:
Well there are a number of issues. First of all current snapshot listing
is a regular apache directory listing, which causes files with names
longer then X amount of characters to be cut off.
Please learn to configure apache:
GMT of cause and as daniel wrote already you could also make the
filenames in the listing longer so that we could read whole filenames.
thanks in advance
marcus
At 23:07 11.11.2002, James Cox wrote:
I can certainly set this up.
any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date)
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Any objections to changing timestamp timezone on source snaps to UTC? Windows
snapshots are already using it.
Would be nice to have...
Derick
--
---
Derick Rethans
19 matches
Mail list logo
