Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread derick
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote: Exactly right. During the last release cycle, Derick made elaborate test cases, etc. but the result was not very promising. Very few people actually took part in the QA process and as a result 4.2.0 was released with some serious bugs in it. I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 10:12 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to hear Stig's opinion on 4.3.0 first, and I tend to agree that we need a 4.2.3 too. I can even find time to do the release process and manage QA, providing there is any feedback to the RC. I would actually like to do that once, if you don't

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread derick
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: At 10:12 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to hear Stig's opinion on 4.3.0 first, and I tend to agree that we need a 4.2.3 too. I can even find time to do the release process and manage QA, providing there is any feedback to the RC. I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 10:15 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would actually like to do that once, if you don't mind :) I don't mind at all... but what is the reason for this? :) Well, first it's been a while since I did, but I'd also like to see it working in the 'new way' once, with the automated QA...

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread derick
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: At 10:15 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would actually like to do that once, if you don't mind :) I don't mind at all... but what is the reason for this? :) Well, first it's been a while since I did, but I'd also like to see it working

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 10:22 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: At 10:15 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would actually like to do that once, if you don't mind :) I don't mind at all... but what is the reason for this? :) Well, first it's been a while

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-19 Thread Sebastian Nohn
-Original Message- From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3 At 10:22 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-18 Thread Dan Hardiker
Lack of momentum is the main reason PHP releases are taking several weeks now. It's not as if people are testing it thoroughly for weeks and weeks... I have a dev box I can test my installation setup on with dev releases of PHP ... where do I sign up? (If needed) -- Dan Hardiker [[EMAIL

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-17 Thread Richard Thomas
Isnt this what a bug/change log is for... If its not in the change log it wasnt put in yet. Just add a small comment at the top. Not all changes currently in CVS may be in this release due to blah blah blah contraints On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 11:19, Liz wrote: there should be 'fixed in the next

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-17 Thread Dan Kalowsky
Because we aren't always sure what the next version will be. Witness the 4.0.6-4.0.7/4.1 release process. On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Liz wrote: there should be 'fixed in the next bug-fix release' or 'fixed in the next semi-major release'. How about Will be fixed in version

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3

2002-08-17 Thread Sebastian Nohn
-Original Message- From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 11:19 PM To: Zeev Suraski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3 Well, my primary workstation was a 64-bit Alpha system for