Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> This did work in the past, most likely up to April 4th :) Where
> there any changes which might have caused this?
Hello Sebastian,
there were no changes that might have caused this. There is nothing
wrong with this, I just compiled the whole source tree (and no
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:20:05AM -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:11:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > > I just noticed that the might be something wrong with the "Build Date"
> > > > information in the output of phpinfo() on Win32.
> > > >
> > > > I just co
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:11:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I just noticed that the might be something wrong with the "Build Date"
> > > information in the output of phpinfo() on Win32.
> > >
> > > I just compiled the latest CVS and it shows "Apr 4 2001" as build
> > > date, not
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:06:34AM -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:34:39AM +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that the might be something wrong with the "Build Date"
> > information in the output of phpinfo() on Win32.
> >
> > I just compiled the late
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:34:39AM +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> I just noticed that the might be something wrong with the "Build Date"
> information in the output of phpinfo() on Win32.
>
> I just compiled the latest CVS and it shows "Apr 4 2001" as build
> date, not "Apr 16 2001" as I
