Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir

2002-09-11 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
Brian France wrote: > At 3:09 AM +0100 9/12/02, Wez Furlong wrote: > >> Arrgh! You should *really* be working against HEAD because there have >> been so many changes since we branched 4.2 - and some of those were >> related to php.ini detection. >> >> It's a LOT easier to deal with patches agains

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir

2002-09-11 Thread Brian France
At 3:09 AM +0100 9/12/02, Wez Furlong wrote: >Arrgh! You should *really* be working against HEAD because there have >been so many changes since we branched 4.2 - and some of those were >related to php.ini detection. > >It's a LOT easier to deal with patches against HEAD (take a look in >README.SUB

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir

2002-09-11 Thread Wez Furlong
Hi Brian, I haven't looked at your patch in detail (sorry! but see below). I thought that the official view was that php.ini probably shouldn't do anything too clever, even if it is quite a simple matter of implementing these advanced features? My position on the include_ini stuff is -0, meanin