At 19:00 27-08-01, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> > You lost your caps too? :)
>
>some time ago already;-) didn't you notice?
No, I hadn't noticed. I'll help you look for them in November :)
>if you are on a site that uses trans-sid for sessions the HTTP_REFERER
>on the next visited site will contai
On 27 Aug 2001 15:25:09 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 13:40 27-08-01, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> >On 27 Aug 2001 01:33:46 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > > The other issue is a suggestion I want to pitch - right now, if sessions
> > > are started after the headers are already sent, we'll get a nic
Hi Zeev!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 13:40 27-08-01, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> >On 27 Aug 2001 01:33:46 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > > The other issue is a suggestion I want to pitch - right now, if sessions
> > > are started after the headers are already sent, we'll get a nic
At 13:40 27-08-01, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
>On 27 Aug 2001 01:33:46 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > The other issue is a suggestion I want to pitch - right now, if sessions
> > are started after the headers are already sent, we'll get a nice
> > headers-already-sent error. If we have trans_sid ena
On 27 Aug 2001 01:33:46 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> The other issue is a suggestion I want to pitch - right now, if sessions
> are started after the headers are already sent, we'll get a nice
> headers-already-sent error. If we have trans_sid enabled (which we will
> most probably, from now o
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 01:33:46AM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> The other issue is a suggestion I want to pitch - right now, if sessions
> are started after the headers are already sent, we'll get a nice
> headers-already-sent error. If we have trans_sid enabled (which we will
> most probably
