On Wed, 9 May 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok. Any ideas how to "not force them because that is evil"
>> but softly suggest them to not use libswf but ming instead?
>>
>> Warning into configure? A note about it being deprecated into
>> configure
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> Ok. Any ideas how to "not force them because that is evil"
> but softly suggest them to not use libswf but ming instead?
>
> Warning into configure? A note about it being deprecated into
> configure help?
>
I'd say a manual note and a message for the
Ok. Any ideas how to "not force them because that is evil"
but softly suggest them to not use libswf but ming instead?
Warning into configure? A note about it being deprecated into
configure help?
--Jani
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> Sterling? Time to nuke swf extension?
> That site of libswf has been updated last time 1999..?
>
> --Jani
>
No... Many people (surprisingly :) still use and rely on the libswf
extension. I've still had (within the last month or two) like 40
message
Sterling? Time to nuke swf extension?
That site of libswf has been updated last time 1999..?
--Jani
On 10 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Operating system: Red Hat Linux 6.2
>PHP version: 4.0.4pl1
>PHP Bug Type: SWF related
>Bug description: S
