> -Original Message-
> From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3
>
>
> At 10:22 19/08/20
At 10:22 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > At 10:15 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I would actually like to do that once, if you don't mind :)
> > >
> > >I don't mind at all... but what is the reason for this? :)
> >
> > Well, first
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 10:15 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I would actually like to do that once, if you don't mind :)
> >
> >I don't mind at all... but what is the reason for this? :)
>
> Well, first it's been a while since I did, but I'd also like to see it
At 10:15 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I would actually like to do that once, if you don't mind :)
>
>I don't mind at all... but what is the reason for this? :)
Well, first it's been a while since I did, but I'd also like to see it
working in the 'new way' once, with the automated QA.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 10:12 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'd like to hear Stig's opinion on 4.3.0 first, and I tend to agree that
> >we need a 4.2.3 too. I can even find time to do the release process and
> >manage QA, providing there is any feedback to the RC.
At 10:12 19/08/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'd like to hear Stig's opinion on 4.3.0 first, and I tend to agree that
>we need a 4.2.3 too. I can even find time to do the release process and
>manage QA, providing there is any feedback to the RC.
I would actually like to do that once, if you don
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Exactly right. During the last release cycle, Derick made elaborate test
> cases, etc. but the result was not very promising. Very few people actually
> took part in the QA process and as a result 4.2.0 was released with some
> serious bugs in it.
>
> From: Melvyn Sopacua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> At 18:19 17-8-2002, Liz wrote:
>
> > > there should be 'fixed in the next bug-fix release' or 'fixed
> > > in the next
> > > semi-major release'.
> >
> >How about
> >
> >Will be fixed in version major.minor.buildrelease ?? ie tell them
which
> Lack of momentum
> is the main reason PHP releases are taking several weeks now. It's not
> as if people are testing it thoroughly for weeks and weeks...
I have a dev box I can test my installation setup on with dev releases of
PHP ... where do I sign up? (If needed)
--
Dan Hardiker [[EMA
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 11:19 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.2.3
> Well, my primary workstation was a 64-bit Alpha syst
Because we aren't always sure what the next version will be. Witness the
4.0.6-4.0.7/4.1 release process.
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Liz wrote:
> > there should be 'fixed in the next bug-fix release' or 'fixed
> > in the next
> > semi-major release'.
>
> How about
>
> Will be fixed in version major
Isnt this what a bug/change log is for... If its not in the change log
it wasnt put in yet. Just add a small comment at the top.
"Not all changes currently in CVS may be in this release due to blah
blah blah contraints"
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 11:19, Liz wrote:
> > there should be 'fixed in the ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
