hi,
i am speaking for the main branch. if the community decides that adding a
function declaration can break anything then just do not commit this into
4.0.5 :)
as far as i have seen many major changes have been made to 4.0.5. anyway it
will work both ways except that calling the function with w
> the idea is that it would be better if the line above is included in
> exec.h... of course it works without it but at least i am not happy with it
> this way.
You would be perfectly right, if we would be dealing with the
main branch of CVS. In the case of the release branch, many
p
> > > a single compiler warning issue - in ext/standard/exec.h there must be
a
> > > declaration of php_Exec:
> > >
> > > int php_Exec(int type, char *cmd, pval *array, pval *return_value);
> >
> > People what do you think? does this need to be fixed? Im no compiler
guru,
> > Sascha do you know yo
