On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 03:42:02AM +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> I think the "step" option which you added is quite useful in every case.
> Why didn't you merge into the branch? there seems no BC problem about it.
I may merge it after PHP 4.3.0 is officially released, but I don't
want to tai
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> I think the "step" option which you added is quite useful in every case.
> Why didn't you merge into the branch? there seems no BC problem about it.
It's a new kind of functionality. And IMO were too far in the Release
Process to merge it now.
Der
I think the "step" option which you added is quite useful in every case.
Why didn't you merge into the branch? there seems no BC problem about it.
Moriyoshi
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 03:28:45AM +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>
> > Hmm, since nothing is mentioned about the rule of character sequ
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 03:28:45AM +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Hmm, since nothing is mentioned about the rule of character sequence
> generation in the manual, I don't think it's so necessary. IMO this new
> feature introduced in 4.1.0 should not be included in the first place
> because i
Hmm, since nothing is mentioned about the rule of character sequence
generation in the manual, I don't think it's so necessary. IMO this new
feature introduced in 4.1.0 should not be included in the first place
because it broke backwards compatibilities pretty much as one of the user
From the feedback I think it's best to revert this. Please do so.
Thanks,
Andi
At 11:05 PM 10/9/2002 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>At 11:03 PM 10/9/2002 +0200, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>>On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 22:56, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> >
>> > > At 1
My guesstimate - lots of people use it. So, I'm -1 on breaking BC...
Zeev
At 23:05 09/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>I haven't :)
>Anyway, I understand your reasoning. I just felt that lately too many
>things have been breaking around us.
>I'm cc'ing php-dev as that is a bigger forum. Have any
Sterling Hughes wrote:
>>Sterling Hughes wrote:
>>
>>
Hmm sounds a bit weird to me but if it's really useful than it's OK :)
>>> I have to agree, and its really not that hard to implement in user
>>> space::
>>>
>>> function count_recursive($ar) {
>>> $total = 0;
>>
> Sterling Hughes wrote:
>
> >>Hmm sounds a bit weird to me but if it's really useful than it's OK :)
> >>
> >>
> >I have to agree, and its really not that hard to implement in user
> >space::
> >
> >function count_recursive($ar) {
> >$total = 0;
> >
> >foreach ($ar as
