At 01:40 02.11.2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 09:35, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Colin Viebrock wrote:
> > I really think the best solution (not perfect, but best) is to specify
> > some fonts so the pages look nice, and hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font
>
> "hard code in the ISO-8859-
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 09:35, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Colin Viebrock wrote:
> > I really think the best solution (not perfect, but best) is to specify
> > some fonts so the pages look nice, and hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font
>
> "hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font" means assuming ISO 8859-1 and
> use
Hi,
Although I have no font problem differently to yasuo, (Actually I have got
Arial Unicode MT) but I've experienced character encoding problem since
your recent patch on ext/standard/info.c.
How come you concluded that part is unnecesary?
> I really think the best solution (not perfect, bu
Wez Furlong wrote:
> On 10/09/02, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>AFAIK, there is no Arial that includes CJK.
>
>
> "Arial Unicode MS" (that 22MB TTF you'll find in \windows\fonts) seems
> to do a good job of including virtually all characters known to man.
Hmm...
I don't have it
At 08:34 9-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
>For once I agree with yasuo here :) phpinfo() doesn't need to look
>pretty, it's for _debug_ output.
Which means it needs to be as clear as possible. Formatting it for readibility
is a plus - you don't want output that's hard to read, as you're already
On 10/09/02, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, there is no Arial that includes CJK.
"Arial Unicode MS" (that 22MB TTF you'll find in \windows\fonts) seems
to do a good job of including virtually all characters known to man.
BTW: Colin - there is a bug report about phpinfo() - yo
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Colin Viebrock wrote:
> > This is getting a little more complicated than I think is necessary.
> > There are two issues here, I think:
> >
> > a) Fonts. Some people didn't like Arial, so I reverted to letter the
> > browser decide. Some people didn't l
At 00:28 9-10-2002, Colin Viebrock wrote:
> >> Log:
> >> don't define fonts ... use the browser defaults
> >
> > Reason being?
>
>Yasuo Ohgaki's post earlier today said:
>
> > > First problem, CSS should not contain specific font
> > > name. Otherwise, characters may be broken under some
> >
