From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tobias Schenck wrote:
> > Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know
about
> > the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de (was on one of the
sites)
> > but quite a couple of people not tracking php.dev might have
> > downloade
From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tobias Schenck wrote:
> > Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know
about
> > the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de (was on one of the
sites)
> > but quite a couple of people not tracking php.dev might have
> > downloade
> since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it
> make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :)
>
Why?? Yes 4.1.0 was leaked on php-general and php-homepage.de but both were
replied to making it very clear 4.1.0 hasnt been released yet. calling
4.1.0pl1 or 4.1.1
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> yes, lets follow the apache scheme of skiping version numbers for
> versions that might have slipped out ahead of time, even if not as
> obvious as in this case, just to make sure to prevent any chance of
> confusion, as we have nothing to loose by
Tobias Schenck wrote:
> actually not just news leaked out:
>
> I found a download-link on one of the german php-related sites and
> downloaded php-4.1.0.tar.gz (around 27th 9:43 GMT).
> Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know about the
> traffic on php-center.de or phpwe
Tobias Schenck wrote:
> Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know about
> the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de (was on one of the sites)
> but quite a couple of people not tracking php.dev might have
> downloaded it.
PHP-Center.de, for which I am a author and edi
Oh..I should read all emails before sending any. :)
But indeed, this would make sense. (PHP 4.1.1 that is..)
--Jani
On 29 Nov 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
>since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it
>make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :)
>
>jim
>
>Zeev S
On 29 Nov 2001 20:05:03 -
Jim Winstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it
> make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :)
IMHO, there s not any official infos about the 4.1.0, I read announces on french php
sites (certain
