Hello,
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
Hello,
Not really an expert in both pear or metabase (just tests experiences). imho one
thing is sure, both got advantage and feel with a completly different approach
(philosophy ?) of an db abstraction layer.
There is many ways to create an abstractions
Manuel,
part of the effort to write an abstraction layer is to factor out common
code and patterns and move this into a common base so that higher level
development becomes easier. a good example of this is persistent connections
handling, which is handled almost identically in all the db
Hello,
L0t3k wrote:
in other words, i dont see the development of an abstraction layer in C
and PHP as competing propositions. the C layer just allows PHP developers to
be more productive and focus on higher levels of application development.
the current PHP abstractions fill the need not
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:07:17PM -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote :
[...] lication. I don't think PEAR-DB provides this. [...]
For me, Metabase and PEAR::DB (and others) were exactly written
for that purpose: driver independent database access. Did I miss
something?
Or do you just want to say
Hello,
Markus Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:07:17PM -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote :
[...] lication. I don't think PEAR-DB provides this. [...]
For me, Metabase and PEAR::DB (and others) were exactly written
for that purpose: driver independent database access. Did I miss
Hello,
Not really an expert in both pear or metabase (just tests experiences). imho one thing
is sure, both got advantage and feel with a completly different approach (philosophy
?) of an db abstraction layer.
There is many ways to create an abstractions layer, every way will be usefull for a
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:29:48PM -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote :
I am afraid that will never happen.
A project for db abstraction as an extension is already in the
works. History discussions about it can be found on pear-dev
archiv.
- Markus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
Hello,
Markus Fischer wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:29:48PM -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote :
I am afraid that will never happen.
A project for db abstraction as an extension is already in the
works. History discussions about it can be found on pear-dev
archiv.
What I meant that it
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 01:47:10PM -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote :
What I meant that it would never happen is the adoption of an existing
database abstraction package.
Can you name a few?
- Markus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hello,
Markus Fischer wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 01:47:10PM -0200, Manuel Lemos wrote :
What I meant that it would never happen is the adoption of an existing
database abstraction package.
Can you name a few?
Metabase, ADODB, PHPlib, etc.. This discussion was already held before.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:03:44PM -0400, lo-tek wrote:
A new OOP database abstraction layer (in C) is in the works.
Should be ready
in 2 or so months...
how is that going to be different from PEARs or the dbx one?
tc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thies
how is that going to be different from PEARs or the dbx one?
i was actually inspired in part by PEAR, so ALISON (Abstraction Layer In
Search Of a Name) is a superset of PEAR functionality. in addition to
current PEAR functionality i've added the following (not exhaustive, and in
no
12 matches
Mail list logo
