On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:09:51 -0800, Jim Winstead wrote:
>i was thinking more along the lines of something that allowed the
>documentation for an extension to be managed on its own,
Documentation somewhere is better than documentation nowhere ;-).
Anyways, I don't have a really strong opinion wh
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:05:18PM +0100, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On 31 Dec 2001 19:18:59 -, Jim Winstead wrote:
> >Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice
> >> or principle)?
> >
> >no objections, but one thing that should be
On 31 Dec 2001 19:18:59 -, Jim Winstead wrote:
>Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice
>> or principle)?
>
>no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what happens
>to the documentation for these extensions
Th
> > Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice
> > or principle)?
>
> no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what happens
> to the documentation for these extensions when they are no longer a
part
> of the core distribution.
Documentation should really be
> look at the current situation with the mnogosearch extension -- 4.1.0
> and 4.1.1 don't support the latest mnogosearch api. it will probably be
> at least three months before a distribution of php that does is
> released. if mnogosearch were a part of PECL, a new version could be
> released and
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:12:25PM -, James Moore wrote:
> The QA Teams job needs to be made as easy as possible, at the moment those
> people still working activly on QA a lot have a very hard time balancing
> time between testing for new bugs, localising and fixing bugs as well as
> making s
> Jim Winstead wrote:
> > no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what
> > happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no
> > longer a part of the core distribution.
>
> QA too.
>
> "I suppose removing some of these less frequently used extensions will
> a
Jim Winstead wrote:
> no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what
> happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no
> longer a part of the core distribution.
QA too.
"I suppose removing some of these less frequently used extensions will
also help make the Q
