Whatever. I just think it makes more sense to put such patches after we branch.
Andi
At 07:34 PM 5/9/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > I want to branch tomorrow so why not revert the patch today and reapply it
> > tomorrow night or the day after?
>
> Because that creates more work than
> I want to branch tomorrow so why not revert the patch today and reapply it
> tomorrow night or the day after?
Because that creates more work than reverting the patch once?
> Same effect but it makes more sense to me to have the tree 4.0.6-dev until
> we branch.
I'd like to see this ap
At 05:20 PM 5/9/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > And that fix of yours is a hack. Could you please revert it?
> > As I remember you yourself told me once that we don't want to fix
> > symptoms but the causes.. :)
>
> There are no rules without exception.
>
> In this case, the macro c
> And that fix of yours is a hack. Could you please revert it?
> As I remember you yourself told me once that we don't want to fix
> symptoms but the causes.. :)
There are no rules without exception.
In this case, the macro can be helpful to determine when you
are using broken extens
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>Please let me know whether the current CVS works for you.
>
>- Sascha Experience IRCG
> http://schumann.cx/http://schumann.cx/ircg
It doesn't. Breaks now in different place but still bre
